Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50*
Memorial Day SaleMemorial Day Sale
Detail Pics

Description

Crank up the versatility.

Designed to fill the void between Black Diamond's hard-charging Zealot and powder-specific Megawatt Skis, the all-new Black Diamond AMPerage Ski is a slarvy big-mountain plank that truly knows no bounds. Featuring a generous amount of rocker in its tip and tail, a slightly cambered underfoot, and a playful core with plenty of pop, this nimble hybrid shines on big-mountain lines, through trees, and, of course, in powder.
  • Rockered tip and tail, wide underfoot, and hybrid shape allow you to surf the deep all morning, send a backcountry booter on your way to lunch, and finish up the day lapping your go-to in-bounds stash
  • Torsion box construction blends the powerful edgehold and durability of birch sidewalls with the weight savings and turnability of a capped top
  • Internal Wall Core Technology uses poplar with birch sidewalls for more pop and better edge hold
  • Formula One tech features three internal ribs to enhance torsional stiffness for greater performance on hard snow and improved turn initiation

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Black Diamond AMPerage Ski

? Share a...

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(optional)

Invalid filetype.

Save

Here's what others have to say...

Hey I was wondering how these what hold...

Shawn

Member since 
Posted on

Hey I was wondering how these what hold up in trees, cliffs and hardpack? I am an aggressive skier, 5'9" and 140lbs. Any opinions on what size and where I should mount them?

lukp451597

Member since 
Responded on

I currently have a pair of 185's mounted with Large Dukes (for sale), they would be perfect for you.I find they are a little soft for me (190lbs), yet still really playful and great in a lot of conditions mostly softer snow! You would probably love them, new or used! Additionally they would probably ski better for you than the zealot, while an amazing ski the metal top sheet makes it pretty stiff. Take a look at Geartrade.com if interested.

 I currently have a pair of 185's mounted with Large Dukes (for sale), they would be perfect for you.I find they are a little soft for me (190lbs), yet still really playful and great in a lot of conditions mostly softer snow! You would probably love them, new or used! Additionally they would probably ski better for you than the zealot, while an amazing ski the metal top sheet makes it pretty stiff. Take a look at Geartrade.com if interested.

How would these do on a groomed trail?

rworl1246640

Member since 
Posted on

How would these do on a groomed trail?

John Duke

Member since 
Responded on

Being a skis with a rocker - camber - rocker profile, it will definitely get the job done on a groomed trail. Granted, this isnt designed to be frontside carver, but itll do fine on traverses and getting to the parking lot beer cooler.

Unanswered Question

Not sure about length with these. I'm 5'...

calp426329

Member since 
Posted on

Not sure about length with these. I'm 5' 8" 170#. Level II Skier on Tele. Usually like my skis in the mid 170's. Made a mistake last year and bought Sir Francis Bacons in 172. Mounted with 22Designs Axls. Too short. Thinking with any rockered ski I probably belong in the high 170s on Tele. 185 seems a bit long, while 175 would probably leave me with another too-short set-up. The rockered skis seem to have too small a sweet spot for me on Tele in my usual lengths so I should go a bit longer, tho 185 seems too big. Not a problem on Alpine. Probably most likely to use as a resort powder ski and for touring. Live out west in the less than blower country of SW Idaho. Any opinions on how short these ski? How big a sweet-spot? Thanks

I am from Idaho and have just moved to...

ovep427370

Member since 
Posted on

I am from Idaho and have just moved to Colorado. I have been riding the a pair of ol' rossy scratches for as long as I can remember. I am getting into back country skiing and looking for a BIG upgrade. Would going to a pair of AMPerages be a good idea, or should I ease my way into the change with a different pair of skis? I have also been looking at Icelantic's Shaman ski... Thoughts on that?

John Duke

Member since 
Responded on

I'd go with the AMPs myself. The mid fat waist isn't going to be too much of a change from the small waist of older Scratches. Plus, with the early tapered shape of the tip and tail, youre going to have a easier time getting in and out of your turns than the Shamans IMO.

I am in the same boat as Ben. I am 5'10,...

Peska

Member since 
Posted on

I am in the same boat as Ben. I am 5'10, 205lb, primarily an east coast tree skier and I am caught between these and the JJ's. I am afraid with my body type I will over power the JJ 185 and really don't feel like bumping up to the AK 195. However, I am receiving mixed reviews about the AMP's. I do not want an extremely soft ski and I am not a 100% confident with the cap construction for the east coast. Can anyone throw some knowledge my way? Being on the east coast I cannot demo, thanks!

Andrew Christensen

Member since 
Responded on

I think these skies are pretty stiff, but still very playful. Chatter is minimal at high speeds. I have skied these for about two seasons now and love them. I would recommend them to anyone. These preform wonderfully in powder and do surprisingly well on groomed. A smaller ski would preform better in moguls. Although if it is hard pack/ice these skies will want to go straight down rather than turn.

Jeff

Member since 
Responded on

These are a little softer than the JJ but have less tail rocker. The JJ may be a better option as they have a shorter turning radius and being an east coast skier myself, a larger turning radius won't do you much. Also you are still able to open up and go fast on the JJ. These are a really good ski to, great for touring if you plan on dabbing into the backcountry.

The Black Diamond Amperage or the Armada...

Ben Paliwoda

Member since 
Posted on

The Black Diamond Amperage or the Armada JJ? I am an aggressive skier and like skiing cliffs, touring, and shredding powder.

Mark Parrett

Member since 
Groups:
Best Answer Responded on

Ben - the JJ, this one is easy. When I saw the dimensions on the AMPerage for the first time I thought that maybe BD had finally made a ski that I would have fun on. I love the JJ. Both the JJ and the AMPerage are slashy, surfy fun shaped skis. The biggest differentiator is the tail - if you like to mach and/or huck your meat, the tail on the AMP is going to feel really soft for you and will both wash out and punish you if you ever land in the back seat. The soft tail is also a short tail. Wheelie city. I feel like the JJ is more balanced overall and doesn't suffer from the tail problems of the AMP. One man's opinion...

Ben Paliwoda

Member since 
Responded on

Mark- Do you think that the BD Megawatt would be better for me than the Armada JJ or not? From what I have heard, due to BD cap construction, they loose their pop super fast.

Ben Paliwoda

Member since 
Responded on

Thanks Mark!

Mark Parrett

Member since 
Groups:
Responded on

Ben - the Mega is a totally different ski. I haven't heard anyone say that it loses its pop, but it rides like a big mountain freeride ski, nothing like the tapered, rockered tip and tails of the JJ or AMP. I hate the Megawatts but lots of folks love them. Go check out the Blistergearreview.com writings on the Mega and the AMP - that should give you a great feel for the two skis.

5 5

sgg3359143

Member since 

I've been searching long and hard for a replacement for my '09 Dynastar Legend Pro Rider. I think I've found it. This ski skis great in powder, yet busts through crud and handles surprisingly well on hard pack. It gets a bit dicey on ice, but manages well especially since its not made for those conditions. I'm impressed by how light they are with Diamir Fritschi Pro Freeride bindings. Skinning is a breeze and my hip flexors are thanking me. If there really is such a thing as a one ski quiver, this ski comes as close to the mark as any I have seen. Great job BD!

New Favorite!
5 5

Steve Goldstein

Member since 

I now have about 15 days on my AMPs and love them. I am 145 lbs and 5'3" and am skiing the 175 as tele with 01s and midstiff springs. Of course they float like a champ but they carve groomers like a race ski and are surprisingly nimble in the bumps. They don't like choppy hard snow but otherwise are amazing. The biggest problem I've had is that they like to go fast and I end up freezing my ass off waiting for my buddies at the chair.

Snowbrdr221

Member since 
Responded on

Are you sure your last name is Goldstien because you sure sound like a Steve G..something that I know who just bought these skies. If so you better come back to Crested Butte and show me what you can do on them.

My AMPs are coming in the mail from SAC and I can't wait. I just hope the 185s are big enough for my 215lbs of terror

5 5

BennyFire

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Love these things in powder. They float well, fast, fun, bouncy, light. I have them on Dynafit Radical FT, they also tour very well. Don't care for them much on groomers or moguls, haven't hit other terrain. When I toured to work one day I continued to ride them as a patroller. I ended up pulling a tobaggon with a large person down moguls and was nervous but they did good. Lots of edge to stop and control but was way more difficult going edge to edge turning since they are so wide and parabolic.

I am 5'9" and 135 lbs, bought the 175 cm, I am happy with the decision yea a shorter ski is better in the tight trees but the extra length is great for fat landings and touring.

4 5

Gordon Gianniny

Member since 
  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

I tried some of these at a demo day at the local mountain, and they were super fun. I don't know how they would do in icy conditions, but in the mixed groomers and choppy pow that we had, they were great! I found them to be very stable and responsive, although they were kind of hard to tele turn. Probably they would just take some getting used to. I would recommend these only if you think you will be skiing mostly softish snow, because they did seem a little bit jittery on the hardpack. Overall, I think they are great skis!

5 5

gogp57841

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

Truely an amazing powder ski. Turning through the soft has never felt so good! I have mine mounted to some Freeride Pro's and the set up is just fabulous! Thanks BD

Amazing skis!
5 5

foe5438632

Member since 

I absolutely love these skis! They are the greatest thing to happen to me in my 15 years as a skier. The start of this season in Telluride has been pretty weak, but they ski groomers and chop great! With even a little bit of soft snow they really light up. I've never had so much fun or been so confident on a pair of skis. Finally got them in 8" of powder today and they were an absolute blast! Can't say enough good things about these. I have fritschi free ride pros mounted to them and can't wait to get into the backcountry.

5 5

Thomas Bourgeois

Member since 
  • Gender: Male

Dude! These skis are so nice. Light and packed with a lot of pop they're stable on the hardpack quite nice on the groomers (long radius), They're so floaty in the deep,very playful, they give you the desire to jump and drop everything you see.They're not so stiff so it will fit great for a slim/light skier like me (6 feet 150 lbs) Its one of the best skis on the market right now for everyone who want to have fun in the side or the backcountry

5 5

Andrew Christensen

Member since 
  • Gender: Male
  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

I bought these skies last season and love them. The flexible, fat tips and skinny, stiff tails make these skies amazing in powder. (Unfortunately I only saw powder a couple times last year) They cut well into hard pack and crush the crud. So you have a lot of control in really any condition. I love these skies and would recommend them to anyone.

Altogether Awesome

I am 14 years old 120lbs and 5.7feet tall....

Charlie

Member since 
Posted on

I am 14 years old 120lbs and 5.7feet tall.
Do you think this ski is good for me? I do a lot of backcountry with my dad and ski mostly at Whistler Blackcomb. Also I try and ski as much pow as possible.
Also can't decide between 165cm or 175cm?
Personally I think 175 because I am still getting taller.

jp sugar

Member since 
Responded on

the 175 should be fine for you. It will take a little more muscle to drive at first but you will adapt.

Peter Koch

Member since 
Responded on

175 forsure. I am 135 pounds and 5'8" and 14 and I skied a 175 dynastar cham 107 last week and it was a perfect length. those have more rocker too. get em'

Im 6'1, 170lbs, debating 175 or 185cm, i...

Matt W

Member since 
Posted on

Im 6'1, 170lbs, debating 175 or 185cm, i like to ski some tighter trees so i am concerned the 185's will be too long.... would love some of your opinions please. Thanks!

Andrei

Member since 
Responded on

185 would be good for you, absolutely!
175 short, regret for the future

Backcountry

RAGE

Member since 
Posted on

matt

Member since 
Responded on

NICE PIC....

Hey there awaiting the same setup as you next week..Being 6'2 195lbs I'm a little unsure of the setup, lots of people teling me It'll be sweet. How tall are you ?

View all contributions... Be patient, it might take a while.