Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Atomic Sugar Daddy Ski - 2008 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Sugar Daddy Ski
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Mother Nature has covered your local mountain with more frosting than your mama could make in a lifetime, and you need something to slice that mountain cake. The Atomic Sugar Daddy Ski makes short work of tall, powdery slopes. A 99-mm waist floats you all over the place, so go ahead and carve your name in cursive on the hill if you can stand to take a break from straight-shotting the steeps all day long. Atomic’s dense yet light Densolite (get it?) core stands up to harsh abuse while maintaining a stiffness that inspires high-speed carving.

Bottom Line: Skis so sweet you’ll frost your pants.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Hey there, I may have the opportunity to get some older (from

Hey there,
I may have the opportunity to get some older (from around 2004) Atomic Sugar Daddy Skis for a great price and i just moved from the east coast to west so i'm getting used to the powder skiing but loving it . I'm a high intermediate to advance skiier - i don't mind speed but not a big fan of bumps unless it is powder. I'm 5'5", 136 lbs. Is 164" length going to be too big of a ski for me? Thanks in advance!

By:
September 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

164cm sounds about right for your size, use and skills. Really fun ski - enjoy them!

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
September 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

rippin' everyday ski

By:
November 7, 2008

these were my first "big" powder ski back in '04, man i loved these skis. they introduced me into the mindset that a big ski is good for everyday use. my one word of wisdom to a buyer is GO BIG OR GO HOME. i made the mistake thinking that i couldn't handle a big ski (i am 5'8" and 140 and went with a 173) so unless you are under 5'5" go with the 183 or bigger.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Is this the same ski as the Janak?

Is this the same ski as the Janak?

By:
April 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Same mold. Same dimensions & turn radii. Janak has a slightly softer flex-pretty small difference though.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
April 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

amazing

By:
March 5, 2009

this is my go to ski, use them at jackson everywhere-all conditions. crud, pow- etc. only advice do not get atomic bindings- way too heavy- ski is really light for backcountry treks and atomic bindings are a deal killer.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: February 24, 2010 by:

By:
February 24, 2010

Ken:What binding would you recommend? I was looking at a Tele binding so I can put on skins and climb. Just did a week at PM in Utah and my Rosi shaped skis and Marker bindings made it tough to traverse.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I skied the rossi s5 recently in some deep pow and loved em.

I skied the rossi s5 recently in some deep pow and loved em. I am looking for a lil more float but dont wantto give up too much maneuverablity. I am 5'10" and 215 lbs. I ski very aggressiv. III+. I liked the forgiveness and softness in bumpbs of s5, how would these compare?

By:
March 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Love em

By:
February 23, 2009

got these two months ago. been using them all winter out west and at home in the east and in all snow depths that i have encountered for 3 and a half feet to an inch of packed powder they have been great. as others have said these skis are insanely fast but dont let that scare you away because at all speeds from the cat tracks to about 50 55 mph they are stable with no chattering. Great ski.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

The new graphics are nice but has the ski itself changed from

The new graphics are nice but has the ski itself changed from last year? What are the changes?

By:
January 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Atomic Sugar Daddy

By:
October 17, 2008

The Sugar Daddy in the 183cm is excellent PNW all around ski. Very stable in wet heavy snow. Great in powder and very powerful on the groomed. I couldn't find the speed limit on these. Would be an outstanding backcountry ski due to its light weight. I was surprised with how quick underfoot these skis were, also due to its stable light weight construction. A lot of new skis have come and gone and the Sugar Daddy is still an excellent choice for most expert skiers.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

what size , in the atomic sugar daddy ski, for a 135 pound 5'2''

what size , in the atomic sugar daddy ski, for a 135 pound 5'2'' woman?

By:
January 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would reccomend the 153. A lot of people like to ski slightly longer skis for more stability at speed or float in powder. If you are a powerful and agressive skier, go 163.

By:
January 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

sick ski

By:
February 10, 2009

skied it in powder, on groomers, on ice, no speed limit, very light

tails are stiff and unforgiving so if you like to lean back not a ski for u
lean forward and rip

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

6'3 200lbs Am I a 193 guy in this ski?

6'3 200lbs Am I a 193 guy in this ski?

By:
December 17, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I think you'll mind the 183 being too short more than the 193 being too long. The added length will help with stability too. Go for the 193 and don't look back.

By:
December 18, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

sweet ski

By:
December 1, 2008

just got e'm last week, went up for some east coast skiin, surprised these handle ice, hardpack, slush, crud anything and everything, will update on how well they do when i get them in some actual powder

have them in 193, no speed limit, faster than my race skis, forget about short quick turns haha, point them down and fly, they are super stable and seriously fast

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Hello, I need bindings for these skiis. Will the Atomic FFG14

Hello, I need bindings for these skiis. Will the Atomic FFG14 B115 work? Do the binding dimensions need to work with the ski? Or can I just by the bindings?

By:
November 18, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Buy any binding that works for your weight, height, and aggressiveness. Make sure you order brakes of 100mm.Yeah the brakes are important but do yourself a favor and buy something lighter than the Atomic bindings. Think Look/Dynastar PX12's or 14's or even better spring for Marker Jesters.

By:
December 18, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: ATO0277

2008 Model No Longer Available

We have a lot more Alpine Fat Skis than that

Alpine Fat Skis

Research other out-of-stock versions:

rippin' everyday ski

5 star rating

By: Gabe Westheimer November 7, 2008

these were my first "big" powder ski back in '04, man i loved these skis. they introduced me into the mindset that a big ski is good for more...

amazing

5 star rating

By: ken karr March 5, 2009

this is my go to ski, use them at jackson everywhere-all conditions. crud, pow- etc. only advice do not get atomic bindings- way too heavy- ski is really more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Lengths:
153cm, 163cm, 173cm, 183cm, 193cm 
Dimensions:
[153cm] 121 / 99 / 111.5mm; [163cm] 123 / 99 / 113mm; [173cm] 124 / 99 / 115; [183cm] 126 / 99 / 117mm; [193cm] 128.5 / 99 / 119mm 
Turn Radius:
[153cm] 25.5m; [163cm] 27m; [173cm] 28m; [183cm] 29m; [193cm] 30m 
Top Sheet:
Leather 
Core Material:
Densolite 
Base:
Diecut 
Tail:
Raised 
Binding System:
No 
Binding Included:
No 
Recommended Binding:
No 
Recommended Use:
All mountain skiing, backcountry, powder 
Manufacturer Warranty:
1 Year 
Country of Origin:
China