Description
Armor where you need it.
- Lightweight, breathable 520SNP is used on the torso and underarms to aid in temperature regulation
- Heavier weight stretch WindStopper is used on the shoulders, hood, and back for added protection and unlimited range of motion
- Underarm zips dump excess heat whether you're hiking, touring, or climbing
Terms And Conditions
This Usage Agreement (the "Agreement") governs your conduct while using various services on the web site Backcountry.com and its affiliate web sites (collectively, the "Site"). All references to "we," "us," and "our" shall mean Backcountry.com and all references to "you" and "your" shall mean the user of the Site and Site Services. This Agreement applies to various services and activities on the Site as well as to gear review and product ratings (collectively, "Site Services"). Please read this Agreement carefully.
BY ACCESSING, BROWSING, AND USING THE SITE, ANY SITE SERVICES AND OTHER SERVICES THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS TERMS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION THEREOF, DO NOT ACCESS, BROWSE OR OTHERWISE USE THE SITE OR SITE SERVICES, INCLUDING THE SUBMISSION OF ANY REVIEWS OR COMMENTS.
Your use of the Site is governed by this Agreement and any other agreements and/or terms of use adopted by Backcountry.com and/or its affiliates. This Agreement shall govern in the event of, and to the extent of, any inconsistency with the Site. For more information on our privacy practices, read the Privacy Policy to understand our practices regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information on the Site and with respect to Site Services.
Any comments, reviews (including gear reviews and product ratings), posts, feedback, questions, answers, notes, messages, images, video, audio, materials, documents, data, graphics, ideas, suggestions or other communications (collectively, "User Content") you submit on the Site are not private or proprietary. By submitting User Content on or through the Site, you grant, assign and transfer to Backcountry.com all of your rights, title and interest, including without limitation, all intellectual property rights and moral rights, in and to such User Content. To the extent the preceding assignment and transfer is ineffective, you hereby grant Backcountry.com an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual right and license to use, copy, modify, adapt, display, publish, archive, store, distribute, reproduce and create derivative works based upon such User Content, in any form, media, software or technology of any kind now existing or developed in the future.
By submitting such User Content on or through the Site, you are confirming that (a) you are the sole author of the User Content and the User Content originated with you and not copied in whole or in part from any other work; (b) you have obtained all necessary permissions associated with the User Content, including without limitation permissions relating to copyrights, trademarks, rights of publicity and/or rights of privacy; (c) the User Content does not contain hate speech or profanity and is not unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, libelous, obscene, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable, an invasion of another's privacy, or otherwise in violation of this Agreement; (d) that you are not a minor and have the legal right and capacity to enter into and comply with this Agreement; (e) such User Content does not and will not, in any way, violate or breach any of the terms of this Agreement; and (f) Backcountry.com shall not in any circumstances be required to pay or incur any sums to any person or entity as a result of its use or exploitation of the User Content.
With respect to your conduct on the Site or while using the Site Services, you agree not to: (a) attempt to disguise the origin of any User Content transmitted to the Site Services whether through the Site or any third party site; (b) act in any manner that negatively affects other users' ability to use the Site and Site Services; (c) impersonate any person or entity, including without limitation, a manufacturer or owner of any product, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (d) interfere with the Site or Site Services, or servers or networks connected to the Site or Site Services, or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies, or regulations of networks connected to the Site or Site Services; (e) upload, post, or otherwise transmit any User Content that with respect to the Site Services: (i) is not relevant to the product, service, person or entity being reviewed; (ii) you do not have a right to transmit under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships (by way of example but not limitation, inside information, proprietary and confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements); (iii) contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or (iv) is unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation.
By submitting any such User Content on or through the Site, you grant Backcountry.com permission to use your name, alias and any other information (as provided by you) to attribute such User Content to you. Without limiting the generality of the previous sentence, and subject to our Privacy Policy, you authorize Backcountry.com, its affiliates, and sublicensees to share the User Content across all affiliated Web sites, and to use your name and any other information in connection with its use of such User Content, as they may choose. You also grant Backcountry.com and its affiliates the right to use any material, information, ideas, concepts, know-how or techniques contained in such User Content. We are not responsible for the similarity of any of our Content or programming in any media to User Content submitted by you. Any and all rights granted in this section are granted without the need for any compensation to you in any form.
User Content does not reflect the views of Backcountry.com, and Backcountry.com does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, integrity, quality or reliability of any User Content, nor does Backcountry.com endorse or support any opinions expressed in any User Content. In no event shall Backcountry.com have or be construed to have any responsibility or liability for or in connection with any User Content, Any gear reviews and/or product ratings submitted on the Site, if displayed, are displayed for entertainment and informational purposes only. Under no circumstances will Backcountry.com be liable in any way for any User Content, including but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any User Content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any User Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted via the Site or Site Services.
If Backcountry.com determines, in our sole and absolute discretion, that you or any User Content you submit violates this Agreement, we reserve the right, at any time, without notice and without limiting any and all other rights Backcountry.com may have under this Agreement, to: (a) refuse to allow you to submit further User Content; (b) remove and delete your User Content; (c) revoke your registration and right to use the User Content Submission Features; and (d) use any technological, legal, operational or other means available to enforce the terms of this Agreement, including, without limitation, blocking specific IP addresses or deactivating your registration, access to the Site and Site Services using your e-mail address, and your user name and password. Without limiting the foregoing, once User Content is submitted to the Site, Backcountry.com may take any or no action with respect to such User Content, including without limitation, deleting, editing, modifying, rejecting, or refusing to post such User Content, but is under no obligation to offer you the opportunity to edit, delete or otherwise modify User Content once it has been submitted. Backcountry.com shall have no duty to attribute authorship of User Content to you and shall not be obligated to enforce any form of attribution by third parties.
If, despite the foregoing assignment and transfer of rights in the User Content, it is determined that you retain moral rights (including the rights of attribution or integrity) in the User Content, you hereby declare that: (a) you do not require that any personally identifying information be used in connection with the User Content or any derivative works of or upgrades or updates thereto; (b) you have no objection to the publication, use, modification, deletion and exploitation of the User Content by Backcountry.com or its licensees, successors or assigns; (c) you forever waive and agree not to claim or assert any entitlement to any and all moral rights of an author in any of the User Content; and (d) you forever release Backcountry.com, and its licensees, successors and assigns from any claims that you could otherwise assert against Backcountry.com by virtue of any such moral rights.
You are prohibited from violating the security of any system or network compromising the Site or the Site Services, including but not limited to the following: (a) unauthorized access to or use of data, systems, or networks, including any attempt to probe, scan or test the vulnerability of the Site or Site Services or to breach security or authentication measures; (b) unauthorized monitoring of data or traffic on the Site or of the Site Services; (c) interference with the Site or Site Services including without limitation, any type of flooding technique or deliberate attempt to overload the system such as denial or service attacks; (d) forging of a message header or any part of a message header; or (e) using manual or electronic means to avoid any use or access limitation placed on this Site or the Site Services. Such violations may result in criminal or civil liability.
Backcountry.com reserves the right to report any activity or persons that Backcountry.com suspects has violated any law or regulation to appropriate law enforcement officials, regulators, or other appropriate third parties (including the disclosure of appropriate subscriber information). Backcountry.com may also cooperate with appropriate law enforcement agencies to assist in the investigation and prosecution of any illegal conduct. Indirect or attempted violations of this Agreement and actual or attempted violations thereof by a third party on behalf of any user shall be considered violations of this Agreement by such user.
BACKCOUNTRY.COM DOES NOT ENDORSE THE USER CONTENT, IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE USER CONTENT AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON OR ENTITY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, PERSONS WHO MAY USE OR RELY ON SUCH USER CONTENT) FOR ANY LOSS, DAMAGE (WHETHER ACTUAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR OTHERWISE), INJURY, CLAIM, LIABILITY OR OTHER CAUSE OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER BASED UPON OR RESULTING FROM ANY USER CONTENT PROVIDED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.
Share your thoughts
What do you think of the
Arc'teryx Venta MX Hooded Softshell Jacket - Men's
? Share a...
My new most days ski jacket
Amicus
Member since
- Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
I have a beloved Cloudveil Koven shell and wanted a soft shell for everyday skiing to preserve the Koven.
I like the jacket very much. It feels bomb proof. My one day in it was Stowe's 2012-13 closing day. 20s in the AM on the scratchy top with hard wind. Mid-40s at the bottom in the PM on wet mashed potatoes and corn. Started with an Arc'teryx Atom LT hoody underneath and over a long sleeve wicking shirt. At mid-day I switched the hoody for a Patagonia Nano Puff vest.
Less windproof than the Koven, but acceptable. Breathability was great as the temperature rose.
As an every day winter jacket, I would prefer my TNF Apex Bionic jacket or the Arc'tyrex Atom LT Hoody. The primary reasons for this is that there are no slash pockets on the shell. I don't find this an issue for skiing because I would always have something underneath. My layers, OR down jacket, Atom Hoody and Nano vest all have slash zippers. The inside slash pockets can be reached via the pit zips for storage access. It does leave a nice clean looking front, but I would add pockets if designers asked me. The other limitation for everyday use is the sleeve. I leave it as loose as the velcro closure permits, because I cannot get my hands through otherwise. Fiddling with the velcro would be a pain just to go outside for wood or similar simple errand.
My ski gloves are guantlets, so I cover the lower sleeve while skiing. I am supposing it would be difficult to get the sleeve over gloves like my XXL Black Diamond Guides.
Fit is a half size small if you don't have a trim waist. I wear XL in TNF, but XXL in Arc'teryx, meaning the XL is tight around the waist and the XXL is loose. I plan to use it skiing and picked XL because it will handle layers. I am 6'2" 265 with a football player's build and about a 38" waist.
Pricey! could be improved
PAUL UDOVIC
Member since
This is a great fitting softshell made from top notch materials. It has a longer length and is slightly fitted compared to most arcteryx shells. The fabric moves nicely with the body during activities and has a touch of warmth with the fleece lining. Very durable face fabric, completely windproof and waterproof to a certain degree (Not sure how much water the finishing tape can hold out). Well placed pit zips that are easy to open
The cons: PRICEY! yikes $450 for a windstopper shell (A well made shell however). But at this price point I would want a Watertight Vislon front zip.
Lack of pockets. I am not a huge fan of crossover (Napoleon) chest pockets but it could use another pocket on the shoulder and perhaps another inside mesh pocket.
3 1/2 stars Overall due to cost factor and missing features
Pingora, Cirque Of The Towers
Mitch
Member since
Backcountry Riding in Lambs Canyon
Chase Skidmore
Member since
Solid
Chase Skidmore
Member since
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
This is a very nice jacket. It was a very pronounced drop back hem. The chest pockets are big but stay out of the way of your harness. Sheds water well with the windstopper fabric and off course it blocks the cold winter breeze. I use this mostly for backcountry snowboarding. The slim cuffs are nice but a little snug when I pull them over my snowboarding gloves for the descent. This fits slimmer than most of my other Arc'teryx pieces and so it might be a good idea to size up if you want to layer underneath. I love the articulated sleeves and huge pit zips. I just wish the main zipper had the same waterproof treatment that the pit zips and pocket zips have.
High quality with some design caveats
Jedidiah
Member since
I won't go into too much detail because everything I would say has already been covered in depth. Suffice to say it is a very well made garment cut to fit a slim fellow quite comfortably. I am 5'11" 160 lb and the medium was perfect.
Anyway, I give this product 3 stars because for my purposes, the lack of pockets is a total deal breaker. I am not a clever man and didn't realize that jackets were made without side pockets. Also, I guess I didn't look closely enough at the pictures or the description--this is all on me.
However, if you think that you will miss having side pockets on your jacket, don't buy this one, because you will.
I wear a size Medium in pretty much all...
cjsvela
Member since
I wear a size Medium in pretty much all of Arc'Teryx's outerwear/hardshell. Is the sizes of the soft-shells the same or comparable to the hard-shells?
Stephen Sramek
Member since
Sizing is consistent throughout the line. I'd recommend a size Medium in the Venta MX for you. I wear a size Medium in Arc'teryx soft-shells and hard-shells.
Comparing the venta MX to the Gamma MX for...
JAKE
Member since
Comparing the venta MX to the Gamma MX for New England Ice, skiing, and general use. Not really feeling I need "full" windproof but maybe a good option to have as my current Patagonia Ascentionist breaks the wind nicely. My question is also about pockets. Has anyone missed the std hand pockets on this jacket? I know they are not useful for Ice and skiing, but have you missed them for daily use or just warming hands? i.e., the gamma has 4 exterior pockets. Thanks.....Jake
Stephen Sramek
Member since
If you all ready have a windproof layer I'd recommend the Gamma MX. I have a Gamma MX that's 7+ years old and is still my go-to softshell.
If windproof'ness is necessary and you're worried about losing hand pockets, check out the Venta SV:
http://www.backcountry.com/arcteryx-venta-sv-softshell-jacket-mens
The Venta SV features two large hand pockets that are lined with a hi-loft fleece on the front of the pocket bag. Great for warming the paws.
Great Jacket
josp381533
Member since
- Gender: Male
- Familiarity: I've used it several times
Used it so far skiing in -20 conditions out west. Worked great, stayed warm. I have the brimstone color and I personally love the color.
The only minus is that the sleeves are quite long for me, probably an extra 3" than I need, so the arms bunch up and I need to tighten the wrist straps.
Would the Venta MX work well in an alpine...
dlombard604808
Member since
Would the Venta MX work well in an alpine ski use? I see the recommended use for the Venta SV includes skiing where the MX doesn't. I typically layer based on the conditions and have the Arcteryx Stingray for wet conditions.
Cal-Hiker
Member since
I really dig the Venta MX for skiing - probably my favorite jacket for the use. It's basically waterproof, totally windproof, and layers well (while being warm enough on its own below 30� for me). The bit of stretch is nice, the articulated cut keeps the jacket out of your way, and pitzips help the jacket breathe. At the resort or skinning in the backcountry, this is my shell.
Venta MX vs Gamma MX
I am torn between...
Josh Allred
Member since
Venta MX vs Gamma MX
I am torn between the venta mx vs the gamma mx.
I have tried on the Gamma MX. I am concerned that the Gamma might be a tad short with pulling over the harness. I did like the feel and weight of the Gamma. It seems like a time tested piece.
The Venta looks like a great piece as well. I am wondering how it fits compared to the Gamma. I am also concerned about how well it breathes and how it packs.
Any help is appreciated, thanks.
Stephen Sramek
Member since
Josh, the Gamma MX was designed for mixed/ice climbing - you should not have any issues with the jacket pulling over the harness. It is a time tested piece and a staple product in the Ascent line. There is a slight difference in length between the Center Back measurements:
Gamma MX: 29 1/4"
Venta MX: 31"
If you're looking for a piece with more foul-weather resistance go with the Venta. It features Gore Windstopper and is fully seam taped. While it doesn't breath quite as well as the Gamma but it does have pit zips. Fit is the same on both pieces (Athletic) and packability is very similar.
What jacket is longer, the Alpha SV or the...
cfuente970522
Member since
What jacket is longer, the Alpha SV or the Venta MX? Just in case I put both together?
Brandon Carlile
Member since
The Alpha SV will cover a Venta MX; the Alpha has a longer bottom hem.
Venta MX vs. SV (my personal opinon)
Jonathan
Member since
Okay so I got the chance to try out both the venta mx and the sv. The sv is noticeably heavier than the mx for obvious reasons. The cut of the mx is longer than the sv both front and back. I would say that the mx has a closer/trimmer fit than the sv in all the areas of the body (chest, waist, arms). The arm length of the mx is a tad bit longer. As far as the materials go. The sv incorporates 3 windstopper fabrics and is a more burly jacket than the mx. The mx has a stretchy windstopper material in the articulated areas (shoulders and outsides of arms, and back). The stretchy windstopper material screams quality and is probably why the jacket is $50 dollars more than the sv. The chest pockets and pit zips use water tight zippers which are used with more of arc'teryx' hardshells. These zippers do not glide as easily as the zippers used on the sv, but offer better water protection. My main reasons why I like the mx more is because of the trimmer fit, extra coverage, and the storm hood. The drop hood of the sv works great with a helmet, I just found that the storm hood offers an even better fit with a helmet as well as more face protection. I am tall and lanky (which the venta mx accommodates this body style very nicely) 5'11" and weigh 125 lbs with ~35-36 inch chest and the mx in a small offers room for layering even though it has a trimmer cut than the SV. The MX is a bit more breathable than the SV due to the less heavy materials used, but the sv provides more warmth. The mx is very lightly insulated but has enough to be used as a stand alone piece in fall/spring conditions with a long sleeve base layer. I got the brimstone color, and it is BRIGHT ( I wanna say it is a bit brighter in person than the picture), which is great for being visible on the slopes or anywhere.
Sorry in advance for the multiple questions....
pma5429451
Member since
Sorry in advance for the multiple questions. With my hands by my side, where should the bottom of the jacket hit me? I have found that I tend to find the Arc'teryx stuff feels a bit short for me (Not sure if it really is, or if my understanding of fit is wrong for active gear). I am 5'10.5" and bought a medium. If it helps, I have the Theta AR Jacket in Medium because I found the length to be the best of the other Arc'teryx jackets I tried on.
Also, do you think this would be a good soft shell layer for climbing Mt. Rainier? What other soft shell jackets should I consider?
Brandon Carlile
Member since
It sounds like the medium is the right size for you. None of the soft shell jackets will be as long as your Theta AR (the longest of the Arc'teryx shells) because you want the shell to cover any under layers. The Venta MX was designed for climbing in cold weather, Alaska specifically, so it should work beautifully on Rainier.
I wonder how this hoody fits, compared to...
zwa4153774
Member since
I wonder how this hoody fits, compared to Gamma MX hoody. Thank you for your time.
Dave Marcus
Member since
Both are cut with Arc'teryx's "Athletic Fit." They will fit about the same.
Is the MX a better jacket than the SV? It...
Tester
Member since
Is the MX a better jacket than the SV? It costs more for some reason.
Dave Marcus
Member since
It's not better, per se. Just different. Here's how:
Arc'Teryx designates jackets designed for more severe weather with SV. The Venta SV is made out of a heavier Windstopper fabric that will keep you cozy in colder weather.
The Venta MX is designed for more mixed conditions and uses the heavier Windstopper on the shoulders, hood, and back for weather protection, but a lighter weight Windstopper (520SNP) for the underarms and torso. 520SNP is a brand new fabric from Gore, which makes it more expensive. And combining two fabric weights is slightly more difficult from a jacket construction perspective.
Plus, it's Arc'Teryx and they pretty much do whatever they want.
Tester
Member since
So since these jackets are not waterproof, they are used as just wind breakers right?
Why is the main zipper on this jacket not...
Hos4165913
Member since
Why is the main zipper on this jacket not welded?
Dean Whitehead
Member since
Hey there, probably because the windstopper isn't "weldable"... my Venta SV doesn't have any welded windstopper seams...
Brandon Carlile
Member since
Arc'teryx left the watertight zipper off of the Venta jackets since they aren't "waterproof" by Goretex standards. The zipper will still block lots of moisture, especially in the form of snow, and there is a backflap to keep wind from coming through.
Does the Venta MX have taped seams?
rol4932889
Member since
Does the Venta MX have taped seams?
PAUL UDOVIC
Member since
Yes the seams are taped with "arc'teryx finishing tape" its not a gore tape
Joshua Moore
Member since
I do not have an exact answer, but I know the VENTA SV does have taped seams. The MX is new and is more expensive then the SV. Also both are considered windproof, which would also lead me to believe that the MX would have the taped seems as well.
Arcteryx does not say on their site.
Tester
Member since
Hey guys I have a question? Why is it good for the Venta SV/MX to have taped seems when the material is not waterproof? Its still going to get drenched with water correct?
Tester
Member since
What is the difference between gore tape and arcteryxt tape? Im assuming one is water resistant and the other is just to keep extra wind from coming thru?
Paul, I got the Venta SV btw and like it much better than any other soft shell I tried on. Wish it was waterproof though. My gut feeling is even in a rain or a snow I will be fine in it.
Tester
Member since
What is the difference between gore tape and arcteryxt tape? Im assuming one is water resistant and the other is just to keep extra wind from coming thru?
Paul, I got the Venta SV btw and like it much better than any other soft shell I tried on. Wish it was waterproof though. My gut feeling is even in a rain or a snow I will be fine in it.
Tester
Member since
What is the difference between gore tape and arcteryxt tape? Im assuming one is water resistant and the other is just to keep extra wind from coming thru?
Paul, I got the Venta SV btw and like it much better than any other soft shell I tried on. Wish it was waterproof though. My gut feeling is even in a rain or a snow I will be fine in it.
Hi - i am looking for a go-to soft shell...
jor4447263
Member since
Hi - i am looking for a go-to soft shell jacket for on mountain skiing. Is this it? Is the venta really that much more of a better option? I really like the scuba hood, but don't want to end up with a jacket i can't use for everday skiing. Any thoughts would be appreciated!
PAUL UDOVIC
Member since
Its a great all around jacket- The only issue i find is the front zipper is not the watertight vislon. SO it allows more air through it and is not waterproof. For a few extra bucks I would pick up the sabre SV jacket and have a fully waterproof breatheable jacket (along with a powderskirt)
So, I was about to buy a new venta SV due...
utah whatchamacallit
Member since
So, I was about to buy a new venta SV due to the fact that I have trashed my current Venta SV. What is the difference between this and the SV version. The SV, from my experience is pretty bombproof for utah conditions (ice climbing, snowboarding, touring etc). Is this somehow more water resistant/breathable and if the mx is better-how much more so? Thanks in advance.
Dean Whitehead
Member since
Hey Utah! From what I can see, I would still go with the SV over the MX... The SV uses stronger face fabrics (520, 720, 800) vs MX (520 only). Both still have pit zips... the MX pocket positioning is different, the MX fit is athletic instead of "layering" and I believe that the hood is made of the Windstopper instead of the Goretex softshell... The only thing that might make me want the MX is the fact that it has a scuba style hood instead of the drop hood, but that's just my preference. Not sure if they are phasing the SV, anyone comment on that?
jan326607
Member since
Dean: would the MX 520 fabric be stretchier?
Dean Whitehead
Member since
Dean: would the MX 520 fabric be stretchier?
Good question, probably not; windstopper isn't very stretchy by design... so changing the face fabric isn't going to change much...
