Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The ability to ignore the weather, even at its nastiest, gives you the power to ride more powder days. The Arc’teryx Men’s Stingray Jacket will have you out getting face shots on days when everyone else is stuck at the base lodge wishing they had the gear to brave the cold. The lightly insulated Gore-Tex soft shell material is so bulletproof that you won't even notice the cold, but it breathes so well that you won't get baked and clammy on a gnarly backcountry hike, either.
Gore-Tex Softshell fabric is guaranteed waterproof and breathable
1.6mm seam allowance reduces bulk and weight
Articulated elbows and gusseted underarms give you free movement and durability
Underarm Zippered vents quickly regulate temperature
Molded zipper garages eliminate icing
Hidden Recco reflector for backcountry safety (not a replacement for a beacon)
Bottom Line: Extreme weather warning = another amazing powder day!
I'm 5"10, 160lb, 42" chest and when I tried Arcteryx Sabre jacket medium size at local shop, it was a prefect fit with enough rooms for even Gamma MX or thick fleece. The local shop does not have Stingray.
I read Stingray is more fitted than Sabre. Am I still be safe to go with Medium or need to choose Large for Stingray?
I'd say a Stingray in Medium would still work well for you even with some layers underneath. You could also check out the Crossbow, which is in between these two but has just a touch warmer fleece in the back and shoulders, and a hood/collar like the Sabre, the storm hood.
These are all made in China now (Arcteryx has its own factory there). I wish it was still made in Canada but I am Very impressed by the quality from China
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
So this is a review for the current Stingray jacket (its the 3rd generation stingray). I owned the first gen. which was great but cut way too short. I demo'd the second generation which addressed the length issue, had better articulation, and the gore tex fabric was changed (more durable). The latest generation is a complete re-design of the stingray (with the same materials). I have to say I really miss the old design, but the new shaping and colors are great. I quickly fell in love with this new style of Stingray. I was skeptical about the pocket design at first, but they are very roomy and really easy to access (they are nice and long too). They are not blocked when you wear a pack, and the shoulder pocket is now large enough to carry my i-phone comfortably. There is only 1 inner pocket, I wish arcteryx had placed another one (perhaps a mesh one) on the inside as well.
I highly recommend the Stingray if you are looking for a great snow-sport jacket look no further. The light fleece lining is soft on your skin and provides a tiny bit insulation. It has a great length in the torso and arms. The hood is perfect over a helmet or can be cinched up when not in use. Materials and craftsmanship are top notch as you would expect from Arcteryx (just could use 1 more inner pocket ;) otherwise perfect
Was just looking at one of these tonight at a local shop. It's Nightshade (dark grey w/ a bit of a blue cast)and Carbon Copy (really dark grey, but not quite black). Very stealthy, looks pretty good, IMO.
Seeing as I have already reviewed the Sabre SV Jacket, I won't go in to much detail regarding the Stingray seeing as they are almost identical (with some key differences). This jacket is great, integrating technical design with a minimalist approach. It is extremely light compared to most Skiing/Snowboarding jackets out there. The fit, unlike the Sabre, is Athletic, which is perfect for someone like me, at 5'9" 130lb. The other thing I prefer over the Sabre SV, is the collar. At first I was skeptical of the collar, because most Arc'teryx layering pieces with collars run extremely short. The Stingray's collar is perfect; its really tall, but not too much to get in the way. It keeps the wind out, and prevents snow from falling down your neck if any snow accumulates in your hood.
All in all, I like this jacket more than the Sabre, not only for looks, but for its fit mostly. The ONLY reason I prefer the Sabre this year, is because of the color selection in the Stingray. I bought the Sulphur color, and immediately I thought to myself, Highlighter Yellow. It's almost the same as buying a completely White jacket. It WILL get dirty immediately if you're not careful. I like the color, seeing as I've always liked the color Lichen, but I can't get behind this color. The Sabre SV comes in the color Greenlight, which is too good to pass up. I would prefer this jacket much more over the Sabre if only the Stingray had a good color selection.
Another comment I would like to add, is I really don't like the hood cinch on this particular jacket. I wish it was designed like the Beta AR or Theta AR's design. The AR jackets allow you to pull the hood tight easily with one hand. The Stingray mimics the hood design of the Beta SL, which to me feels cheap. Other than that, I love the jacket.
Nice quality jacket. It is sized a little bigger to facilitate layering. I am 6'1" 210 lbs and the XL is comfortable and allows me full range of motion, however I would not want to go any bigger. If I was not planning on layering it underneath I would probably return it for a L.
I bought this jacket 2 years ago, so I think it's time for a review. I use this jacket mostly for skiing (almost always in the Andes mountains, one time in Breckenridge, CO), although I've used it for backpacking/trekking as well in the South of Chile (rainy). I would give it 4.5 out of 5 stars.
This is a REALLY well built jacket. I spent about 3-4 months trying on shells (from OR, Marmot, The North Face, Patagonia), and this is the one that I liked most. I liked it because it is not baggy and it lets you layer up. I can easily and comfortably use a Patagonia Down Sweater below it, and on freezing conditions I can even use a 200 weight fleece below the Down Sweater (low activity). There is really no problem for layering up, and never looks baggy!
My Stringray Jacket is Large. I'm 6'3" 185lbs and ski most of the time with a Patagonia R1 as base layer (medium) and TNF Apex Bionic Jacket (Large) below this one. For me, this combination is good up to about -5°C or -6°C (23°F) on resort skiing activity.
On construction, I think the hood it the best part of this jacket. Really well made, comfortable, easy to put on. Zippers are nice, not difficult to open/close. When using a backpack, you understand why "hand" pockets are so high. It has 2 small interior pockets too.
It is completely wind and water proof. My only complaint is the collar. Is is a bit wide, so I like to use a wind resistant layer below it on windy conditions, like a softshell. Also, because of my size, I would like it to be a bit longer, but that is just me. The powder skirt stays in place. Arms could be a bit longer too.
It is packable, although not ULTRA packable. It's good for skiing, but I would consider another jacket if you'll use it not only for skiing. At left, a photo of the fuzzy interior.
I would recommend this jacket. Mine is made in Canada.
I'd probably go for the Crossbow, mainly because I like the taller collar which offers more foul weather and neck-deep powder resistance. The Rush has the same collar but is a Proshell. Crossbow has a bit of fuzz through the body so offers just a bit of warmth and is softer.
Bought the Stingray to replace a tired hardshell jacket. I'm 6'4", ~200 lbs with long arms and a "slim fit" build. The XL is a great match for me. Currently, the specs on this page say the "Fit: regular". This is not quite accurate--as the Stingray is constructed in the Arcteryx "Athletic Fit". Meaning the jacket fits trim but with just enough room for a fleece under layer. See the Manufacturer sizing chart: http://www.arcteryx.com/sizing-charts.aspx?EN
So far I've skied with this jacket 8 days this season and love it. I have also worn it on wet days to work as a rain jacket. Like a submarine, the GoreTex shell is fully waterproof. I NEVER fear wind or powder creeping in on me.
The style is minimalistic but everything about the design is well thought out. The hood has plenty of room for a helmet and lays perfectly when not in use. Plenty of articulation and breathable for whatever the use.
I am very much interested in buying this jacket. However, your website does not disclose number and type/placings of pockets of the jacket. I will appreciate your mailing the exact information to me as soon as ever possible. I would go for size M in yellow.
I picked this up to replace a backcountry.com stoic 3.0 as my go to ski jacket. It was a good call. At first I was worried about the durability of the softshell material (especially when compared to the burliness of the stoic), but after plowing through several tree branches of varying degrees of unfriendliness its proved itself to be pretty tough. The powder skirt works well, the jacket breathes (g-tex), and of course its totally wtpf. Also, the hood does fit over a helmet. I only have two small problems with it, and they are pretty insignificant. The fuzzy fleece lining on the inside catches on wool (or anything that's not swishy), and the pit zips could use mesh to keep snow out. But yea, an awesome jacket all in all. Try and get it for cheaper than $500 and it will be even more awesome.
How cold can you wear this jacket without mid layers? I have a few covert cardigans/pullovers that I can use as a mid layer as well as a Firee. With those combos will I still need a heavier jacket in single digit temps?
Update: Thanks for the responses. That is pretty much what I figured and what I'm looking for. I guessed that the "insulation" would be along the lines of the insulation in the Venta AR jacket which is more for comfort than warmth.
I just skied Snowbird the last couple days with a Stingray jacket, layered with a Phase SV and the Atom Jacket, which, when layered, is about the same warmth as a Covert. It was -15f! at the top, and I was comfortable as long as I kept moving and kept my face covered. If you wore your Firee under the Stingray you'd be cozy standing around at these temps.
To answer your question. This is not an insulated jacket at all. Arc'teryx says it provides 'light insulation' but this can be misleading. I would check out the Phase AR base layer. I wore just the baselayer with it skiing and it was fine in temperatures above freezing (32). I would definitely recommend looking at a mid-layer. Arc'teryx jackets are generally never one-piece insulation. The point of 'light insulation' is to provide superior layering options. Shells in general get colder, and the Gore Soft shell prevents the shell itself from making it colder than it should be. Hope that helps.
a bit of clarification on the term "softshell" this is used in two ways. In this case it's GoreTex SoftShell- a trademarked name indicating a totally water and wind proof jacket, with a bit of polyester fuzz inside to give it a soft feel, and just a touch of warmth. The GoreTex SoftShell are great for fighting off foul weather and keeping you dry when it's dumping or pouring rain. The other "softshell" use, is as a category of jackets that are typically very breathable, stretchy and weather resistant, as opposed to totally weatherproof-this family of garments is best for high-output activities where breathability is as important as weatherproofness.
It's a shell meaning that it has very little insulation. It has a very, very light fleece lining but really that's just for texture as opposed to warmth. You'll definitely want to layer this on top of a bottom layer and, depending on temp, a mid-layer. The outside is Softshell Gore-Tex, as opposed to other types of Gore-Tex (e.g., Pro Shell) which, though still water and wind proof, makes it a bit soft to the touch and which gives it just a slight stretchiness. Check out Arc'Teryx's website for a really good description. I picked this up a few weeks back and just got back from a trip out west and loved it.
I picked up the Stingray since my 2 year old Marmot "waterproof" jacket was leaving me soaked. At 5'10" 185lbs -32"waist 41" chest, the Medium fits really well with no extra loose material. The sleeves are a little long but work great when you're reaching overhead and doesn't expose your wrists. While the fit is perfect when worn with just a shirt, it is a bit tight with a thick fleece mid-layer. The description says a generous fit but that must be in comparison to other Arc'Teryx jackets. I was working in heavy rain today and had no moisture inside the jacket and water didn't collect at the cuffs and seep in. A little light on pockets as it is a minimalist jacket. Very happy with the choice, I just may need to get a thinner fleece mid-layer for the winter.
I go skiing every year and I also go on tons of backpacking trips in the mountains where it tends to get extremely cold and rainy. I wanted to get a jacket that would be great for both of these things and was thinking the stingray might be the one. Which jackets would you recommend?
If you're using your jacket more for backpacking and the occasional ski trip you'll be better served by the Arc'teryx Beta AR. The Stingray is made from goretex softshell, so is going to be heavier and more bulky when you pack it. The GoreTex Pro-shell, used in the Beta AR is lighter, more packable, more breathable, and it also uses a more durable face fabric, but doesn't give up any of the weather protection. The only thing you'll give up is a powder skirt.
Between the Stingray and the Theta AR, which would be best for both backcountry touring (lots of uphill) and inbounds skiing? Are there other comparable jackets out there (e.g. something by Mountain Hardwear, Marmot, or Patagucci?). I currently own the Stoic Welder Hi but that jacket seems way too hot for backcountry applications.
Get the Theta AR or Theta SV jacket. They will suits your needs the best. They both use gore tex pro shell. The SV uses a heavier denier fabric throughout the jacket, where as the AR mixes a heavier on high wear areas and a lighter denier on the other parts. The hood configurations are slightly different as well. If your mid layer have hoods than go with the SV. The stingray is more of a resort type jacket- with a light fleece backing.
I can only speak of arcteryx jackets since that is all that I use these days. I am sure there are great products from other manufacturers, but I have rarely been dissapointed by arcteryx and they have the best warranty in the biz.....
In typical Arc'teryk fashion, the quality of this jacket is phenomenal. It's the little things that make this jacket so incredible. The hood doesn't have a way to hide it away, but the design of the fabric hold the hood down and back in the perfect location. The high-mounted front pockets are huge and give plenty of room for a front pack.
Many people ask about the insulation -- it's barely a fuzz. I wouldn't call it insulation in any way -- it's a typical hard shell. The only thing it's good for it being soft against your skin if you're in a t-shirt.
This is a great multi-use jacket, from the ski slopes to hiking. It's my new go to ski jacket and is the highest quality jacket I've owned in a long time.
My only complaint would be no mesh on the pit zippers, but a good inner layer should protect against small amounts of snow.
This jacket is everything I've always wanted in a jacket. I live in the south and needed a super waterproof jacket for spring and fall hiking, as well as a jacket I can layer up and go skiing, when I travel. I'm a husky outdoors-man and often flutter between hot and cold. This jacket makes it easy to regulate your core temperature. I own many North Face jackets and shells and this by-far-and-away is the highest quality, best performing, lite weight jacket I've owned. You have to look close to appreciate the quality. The seams are micro-trimmed and tape sealed. The zips are water tight and stylish. I put on my jacket and snow-pants and climbed into the shower to test the jacket. The only thing that got wet was my socks.
The fit of the jacket is correct to size. Its not tight and restricting nor loose and gangster. I wish the back tail of the jacket was about 2-3 inches longer yet its not an issue at all. The pit zips can be a little difficult to adjust with heavy gloves on due to small(approx. 1") pull tabs. The lining of the jacket is lite and soft to the touch. It works great for layering, and as a stand alone jacket. I have yet to find a purpose which this jacket fails. The pocket in the sleeve is the perfect fit for an iPhone but there is no pass-through for headphone cord.
The lower torso pockets are large enough to smuggle watermelons or a baby rhino. They are sealed off from the interior of the jacket as not to be uncomfortable with your hands in them in blowing conditions.
The jacket is warm and windproof. I was out in a winter storm last weekend with 20-35knot winds and 1"/hour snow falling. I found myself unzipping the pit zips to cool off after 15-20 minutes of hiking. The only downside of this jacket is that the hood does not stow. I guess for $50 more you can have that option in another jacket. The jacket is worth every penny of the retail price.
Arcteryx makes great garb. Its expensive, but so it gold. I have purchased four arcteryx jackets, snow pants, mid layers tops and bottoms, CTS shirts and a hat. All conform to the highest quality standards in the industry. Dare to compare this to a North Face jacket, you'll see...
The seams are fully taped and the zippers are waterproof. i have this exact jacket and have never worried about it in the worst storms, nor have I noticed any leaking of any sort. Yes, its waterproof, all the way.
Same Materials, Slightly different cut and pocket configuration. The sabre has a looser cut to it with slightly larger pockets. The hood is also a 1 piece, and the stingray has the collar and hood. You really can't go wrong with either jacket- They are both well made and bombproof (so to speak...) It may be more of a personal preference of colors......
This jacket is a soft shell jacket with the power of Gore-Tex! Think of a soft, quiet, waterproof material. It is just a shell with a micro fleece type lining to add a little softness to the inside. It has a powder skirt which I think all jackets should come with and the pit zips to dump heat. Don't forget to clean and re-waterproof it with Nikwax!
My view is that it depends on how you want to layer it. I'm 5"8 150lbs and have a large Stingray. (for reference - I have a medium Sidewinder SV.) I find the fit of both similar. With both, I can't fully layer up one smaller size down - which for me on the coldest day would be a baselayer, a 100 weight fleece and a Arcteryx Maverick fleece. Even if I drop the 100 weight on a cold but not brutal day, I found the M Stingray too tight. On the other hand, with minimal base, the M is just right. My collection of Arcteryx mid and outer layers is comprised of both M and L for these reasons. In the end it's up to you and you won't really know until you get a chance to play around.
I'm 5'7 and 180 . . . I tried this jacket on locally today and found that the medium was surprisingly tight around my hips, but fit everywhere else. The large was a bit too baggy everywhere for my taste. I really like the style of this jacket, but neither size fits me well enough for me to spend $500 on it.
Can anyone compare this most recent version to the previous year? Slightly lighter this year. Wondering about length, interior, and whether this years version Winter 2010 retains the two smallish interior zip pockets? Wish the pockets were bigger. Believe the material weave is slightly different and went from something like a 580 to 510 nylon and perhaps this may have reduced the "crinkle" factor?
the Arc'teryx Stingray (2010) does use a slightly more pliable fabric, but not less durable. The bottom hem is slightly longer, and the pattern is revised, with even better articulation in the shoulders. Pockets are the same as the older version.
So this is a review for the current Stingray jacket (its the 3rd generation stingray). I owned the first gen. which was great but cut way too short. I more...
Seeing as I have already reviewed the Sabre SV Jacket, I won't go in to much detail regarding the Stingray seeing as they are almost identical (with more...