Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 16 Reviews

Arc'teryx Gamma MX Hooded Softshell Jacket - Men's - 2009 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

Gamma MX Hooded Softshell Jacket - Men's
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Some companies make jackets to look good. Arc'teryx builds jackets to perform. Sticking with what it knows Arc'teryx made the Gamma MX Hooded Softshell Jacket to handle the mountain's harshest conditions. A combination of Polartec Power Stretch and Schoeller Dynamic fabric ensures serious breathability so you don't sweat like crazy, and all the weather protection you need to keep yourself dry on a snowy day. Steep ice, big alpine routes, or a day of backcountry skiing, this Arc'teryx jacket handles it all.

Bottom Line: Built for the 'pine.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Does anybody have the measurments of the front and back in size

Does anybody have the measurments of the front and back in size L and XL??

By:
September 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Size large has a front zipper of 28" long. Will have to check on the center back length

By:
September 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

my favorite just got better

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
April 1, 2010

Just got a new MX and this thing is better than ever. Lighter, they removed excess softshell behind the pockets and replaced with mesh. Such a good fit, I am 6ft 160lbs and the medium fits me really well. Putting it on made me seem lighter and faster.

So great to be back in the Gamma MX

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Will this jacket work for a) bike commuting and b) cross country

Will this jacket work for a) bike commuting and b) cross country skiing.

I have a Theta AR I bought two years ago. Great jacket that has served me very well. I really like the cut. I would like to expand my jacket options for activities where I think the Theta is less ideal.

Let me explain. I live on top of hill. I bike downtown to work. I need a jacket that can break the wind. Intended temperature range is 50 to 20. If I add in the windchill the lower temperature is about 5F. For this the Theta is is outstanding. But going back home the Theta does not breath well enough. Going home the weather is usually warmer, and I sweat way more going uphill. Would the Gamma MX Hood be a good option here?

I do some Cross country skiing, and the Theta is great for the back-country and in the mountains, but for warmer days in the tracks just outside of town its overkill. Would this jacket be a good option?

Also, how does the fit/cut compared to the Theta AR?

Thanks!

By:
August 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

BTW: Gamma MX fit much slimmer compared to the theta AR.

By:
August 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

These jackets breathe exceptionally well. They allow some air through (so they are not completely windproof) It is a great jacket for XC skiing. it provides a bit of warmth (apparently equivalent to a 200wt fleece). Riding home on your bike you are probably going to sweat in this shell as well. While it breathes well it has that insulating property that will cause heat build up (even with the pockets open for venting). Try the gamma LT as a option for biking home or the celeris- each model breathes much better but is not as windproof.

By:
August 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Much Love

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
September 18, 2009

As a longtime devotee of the Arc'teryx Gamma MX (I've been wearing them for 7 years) I'll give some insight to the new version. Fit is basically the same: athletic, long sleeves, fairly close torso. This new Gamma MX uses a new fabric that is a bit lighter, dries more quickly, and has a softer face. It maintains the old characteristics of being super durable (much more than you'd expect from a soft face fabric) lots of stretch, blocks about 90% of wind and very water resistant, while breathing much better than laminated soft shells. The Hooded version, which I prefer has a helmet compatible hood, with slightly less volume than the old one, which I consider an improvement. Have no fear, it's really an upgrade from the classic Arc'teryx Gamma MX of old!

Was this helpful? (4) (1)

Flag

I am 6'2" and 238 lbs. I am considering the new Gamma

I am 6'2" and 238 lbs. I am considering the new Gamma MX hoody. I like a little room so should I go XL or XXL? (arm length 34-35 and neck 17.5-18")
Thanks.

By:
August 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Use your chest and waist measurements too, but this jacket runs to the fitted side. Really depends on how your body mass is distributed. You might get a little more in the sleeve than you need, but my thought is that you'll get more of the fit that you want with the XXL.

By:
August 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Weird fit, over priced

By:
July 18, 2011

I ended up returning this jacket. The reason is because the sleeves are too baggy. It's huge in the shoulders and then tapers down to nothing around the wrists. I'm a climber so I like my gear to fit close to my body. If you're a body builder with huge shoulders and neck muscles but have really skinny wrists this jacket will fit you perfectly. If you have big pectorals though forget it. The chest of this jacket is pretty slim fitting.

I still gave this jacket 3 stars though because besides the fit it is very nice. The lining is super soft and comfy BUT so over priced. While I agree, Arc'Teryx does make very good clothing, after returning it I found a mountain hardware soft shell of the same quality on sale for only $100 dollars. Unless you're trying to make a social statement by wearing this jacket, save your money. Get a mountain hardware soft shell and a patagonia R3 Fleece, it's more versatile, better fit, warmer, fuzzier fleece and half the price for both items!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: July 18, 2011 by:

By:
July 18, 2011

If you look at the picture, you can actually see where stylist folded all the extra material in the armpits under neath so that it looks like it should in the arms. This jacket does not look like it does in the picture when you put it on. FYI.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

any other size at lichen colour (Large)?

any other size at lichen colour (Large)?

By:
August 13, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey there, you might want to keep an eye on the new version of the Gamma MX (tem: ARC1182), as they will be phasing this one out and stocking the new version....

By:
August 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

The go-to ski touring jacket

By:
January 28, 2011

Unless there is heavy wet snow or (the horror!) rain, this is the outer layer that goes in my back for nearly every activity. Overall a wonderful jacket with a few downsides. In the temperate northwest, I've found this jacket a bit too warm to skin in (but when the temps dip into the 15 or below range, it's ideal for that purpose), so mainly this is the layer I throw on for the down.

Pluses:
- Sheds water remarkably well while being far more breathable than a hardshell
- Micro-fleece interior adds a bit, but not too much, warmth
- Mesh-backed pockets allow for a bit of venting
- Simple and clean

Minuses:
- Arms are a bit on the long side (I'm a shorter dude)
- The hood is helmet compatible, but maybe a bit of overkill (pretty huge)
- Non-adjustable cuffs (I think this is fine, but you might not)
-Pricey!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

any new colors coming

any new colors coming

By:
June 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

round september there will be new colors coming along with changing the fabric that the gamma MX is made from (will now be fortius 2.0) and a slight price reduction -349
I am not sure how well the new fortius fabric will perform though.
Hope this helps

By:
July 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

u can do better

By:
April 12, 2011

ok 1st lemme say i lovee arcteryx bein i own 3 of em the alpha vs,firee,and hyllus.i decided to try this jacket bein it had alot of great reviews so i did .i loveeed the chest pockets wow very useful and the hand pockets worked very well.the 1 thing i didnt like was that 4 the same money u could buy the hyllus hoody which pretty much is made from the same material but wth a fleese jacket inside.id love to be able to get the pockets of the mx on my hyllus then id b in heaven.i guess this is a ok jacket but for just the same money u can get more in the hyllus

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: September 3, 2011 by:

By:
September 3, 2011

Presumably some people don't want the extra warmth of a Hyllus...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
April 13, 2011

Iff you lovveeed to not sweat a hole bunch and get real wet thenn the gama xm is realy alot nice.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Hey Guys, I'm not sure quite what size to get. I am 6'1"

Hey Guys,

I'm not sure quite what size to get. I am 6'1" and I weight 190 pounds but very fit and trim. I can't decide between the medium and large. I don't like my jackets to fit very baggy but rather tailored without being tight. I will be layering it but not with anything bulky (a 260 icebreaker sweater sometimes just a tshirt). Any imput would be appreciated. Thanks guys.

By:
June 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Echoing Ryan, you definitely want a large.

By:
June 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

You'll need a Large, to fit your sleeve and torso length. Depending on your build it might be a tad baggy, but these have a slim cut to them.

By:
June 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

The best of the best!

By:
November 5, 2010

5 stars do not give this jacket near the respect it deserves. I have searched long and hard, returning jacket after jacket only to find that each was either too short (as I am 6'5") or did not quite provide for the versatility I was looking for. The Gamma MX is incomparable to the others in it's class. The Polartec Power Shield holds in heat while still providing for movement and comfort. The soft shell is soft, yet resistant to anything that comes it's way. Whether it be weather or ware, this jacket is almost bombproof. It is not quite waterproof, though if I was in a storm that this jacket couldn't provide for, I'd have a hard shell with me, as anyone in the right mind should. The accented color is also a great bonus. Overall this jacket exceeded my expectations and was well worth the money. Acr'teryx never disappoints.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Is there a different in the fit between the hooded gamma mx and

Is there a different in the fit between the hooded gamma mx and the gamma mx jacket? I tried on both and the hooded seemed a little bigger/roomier.

By:
June 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Gamma MX Hoody is just a touch roomier, and has an extra 1.5 inches in the length. Plus, Hoods RULE

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
June 17, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

I DIG IT.....

By:
November 8, 2010

Sweet Jacket. A little tight, but it still rocks. What`s up with the made in China ? You won`t be disappointed if you buy this....

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does the hoody part have adjusting straps on the back for when

Does the hoody part have adjusting straps on the back for when you dont have your helmet on?
Thanks.

By:
May 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Todd,
THe Gamma MX is the 2 way adjustable hood. So it has the adjusters that cinch around your face, and the back adjuster (like you have mentioned) that tightens the hood around your bean (like a baseball cap). Be aware that the hood is very large, but you can cinch it down quite a bit when you dont have a helmet on.
Hope this helps

By:
May 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Comfortable, high performance, looks good.

By:
April 19, 2010

extremely comfortable light jacket that looks great and performs well. This is ideal for highly aerobic activities in cold weather. This is a highly specific jacket. It is not insulated and offers no wind resistance so you have to be pumping out some heat or use it as a layering piece. It is cut very nicely so you can easily layer over it. It can handle light snow, but will not keep you dry in a light rain. great for around town too.
I have the gamma mx hoody, atom lt hoody, sigma sv, alpha sv, alpha sl, and theta ar - the gamma mx is the least versatile and so it gets used the least.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: December 14, 2010 by:

By:
December 14, 2010

I agree with the follow up comment. I've found it to be pretty versatile. I wore it to a Costa Rican rain forest to block out the rain in normal temperatures, and wear it to go ski in Lake Tahoe. I wear it on the streets of San Francisco when the days get cold and windy, and I layer it up underneath if I need to. It breathes well which is why I ski in it or do any activity in it. It's my go-to jacket!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
November 7, 2010

Huh? The Gamma MX blocks about 90% of the wind and has a light fleece laminated to the face fabric to provide medium level insulation. I have to say, I think the Gamma MX is the most versatile of all these!

Flag

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

When is it in stock that the option is red and small?

When is it in stock that the option is red and small?

By:
April 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Another option is to get on the Live Chat, they can look up when the next shipment is coming in. Live chat is the "CHAT NOW" button in the upper right corner of the page.

By:
April 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The best thing to do is contact Backcountry 1.800.409.4502 and they can let you know for sure.

By:
April 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Amazing...if it fits.

By:
December 20, 2009

I love Arc'teryx gear, the quality is amazing and this jacket does the right thing in so many weather conditions.

BUT! If you are a man, over 6'2" tall, and even slightly barrel chested this (and many other Arc jackets) WILL NOT FIT. It is unbelievably short in the front, I ordered an XXL and the base of the zipper doesn't even touch my belt buckle. And of course, if you are even slightly overweight I would steer clear of Arc gear entirely. I don't understand why they have an XXL size if they don't want fat f***s wearing their gear...but for gods sake you need to make TALL sizes for those of us who bang our heads on stuff all the time!

ARC'TERYX FIX YOUR FIT FOR TALL MEN!!!!!

Was this helpful? (3) (1)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: September 22, 2010 by:

By:
September 22, 2010

Yeah, I'm 6'6" and its impossible to find stuff that fits. But I would say Arc'teryx stuff fits better than anything else. I wear an XL jacket and it works for me.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
March 10, 2010

amen to that!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

When can Backcountry get the small size in stock? Thanks.

When can Backcountry get the small size in stock?
Thanks.

By:
April 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I see the black small come, but I kinda like lichen more. Will they come soon?

By:
April 8, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

A few more are expected throughout this month. Keep checking back.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Good lightweight jacket

By:
February 23, 2011

This is a good jacket. It is quite a bit lighter/thinner than I was expecting, though it is warm for it's weight.

I've used the jacket xc skiing in Maine in single digits, only atop a thick baselayer and it is the perfect temperature for that high-level of activity--not too hot or too cold.

The hood is a great bonus, easily adjustable and well-constructed.

In my opinion this jacket is a bit overpriced, but I do like it and I'm sure I will not be needing another one for at least a decade.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does anyone know how this compares to the Mountain Hardwear Dragon

Does anyone know how this compares to the Mountain Hardwear Dragon jacket? They both are hooded softshells and both weigh practically the same amount.

By:
March 18, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Thanks a lot for the response. I already own the Venta AR and really love it, but need a softshell with a hood for a climb that's coming up. Sounds like the Dragon might be the way to go for this particular adventure. Thanks again!

By:
March 19, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Gamma MX uses a stretch woven face fabric with a light fleece laminated to the inside, where as the Dragon uses Windstopper. You'll get quite a bit more breathability and stretch from the Gamma MX, and a bit more weather protection from the Windstopper membrane. A closer comparison to the MH jacket is the Venta from Arc'teryx. I've used both Arc'teryx jackets, and the Venta (windstopper) is great for cold weather, but I find I pull out the Gamma MX way more often throughout the year.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
March 19, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Bomb Proof

By:
March 7, 2010

Clearly the best jacket I have ever bought...trust me there have/are many. Worth every penny. Two Thumbs up!

Was this helpful? (2) (1)

Flag

I am 5'8 and 137 lbs with a chest size of 36. Would a S

I am 5'8 and 137 lbs with a chest size of 36. Would a S or M be better for me? I plan to have a baselayer and possibly a Patagonia R2 underneath.

By:
March 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Definitely small. I am 5'7, 160lbs, 38 chest, and the small fits me perfectly. The amazing thing is that it is snug with just a t-shirt, but I can also easily get 2 base layers and a light fleece under it. Great design.

By:
June 18, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 5'8" 140lbs. I have a Small Gamma LT and a Medium Gamma AR. I can't fit much more than a base layer under the small. It gets a bit too restrictive with something like a fleece under the small. The Medium is a bit baggy without a mid-weight layer under it but it still fits well on it's own. I plan on getting a Small MX when the Red comes back in stock.

By:
March 10, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Small...I am a medium at 5'9 155lbs to 160lbs....

By:
March 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Gamma MX hoody

By:
March 10, 2010

Unbelievable, I opened the package and was surprised at the thinness and weight, to be honest a bit disappointed at first as I expected something a bit heavier. As soon as I put this jacket on my disappointment vanished, the fit is perfect I'm 5'10" 160 with an athletic build, my medium fit like a tailored suit. Despite the weight and overall thickness this jacket remains oblivious to the weather outside. Blizzards, rain, wind chilling temps and sunny days it doesn't matter, with the right layering this jacket answers to all conditions. I've skied woods, nailed branches and brushed trees and not a dent or rip to be found. As for the construction Arcteryx certainly sets the standard, I've mostly bought TNF stuff in the past and the two are incomparable. I think this is where the old adage "you get what you pay for" comes to mind. My only complaint which is a minor one, is the hood, without a helmet on its HUGE but with the right cinching it becomes manageable. If your on the fence about this baby just get it, you wont be disappointed. I will never buy another shell other than Arcteryx.

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

Any Candy Apple Red size Small coming in? Or is there a 2011

Any Candy Apple Red size Small coming in? Or is there a 2011 replacement?

By:
March 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Candy Apple Red does continue for S'11. There are more on the way...

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
March 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best soft shell

By:
November 12, 2009

This is my first Gamma MX and did a lot of researching before I made the investment. Everything I've noticed about this jacket is well thought out. Soft fuzz by the neck and chin for comfort, adjustable hood with small visor, very stretchy fabric while still holds up to abrasion. I have not experimented with it yet in heavy rain although drops tend to bead. Very wind resistant and light. I bought this for mild cold conditions to pair with the Beta SL in case of a downpour.

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

So is it just me or does the jacket version of the Gamma MX have

So is it just me or does the jacket version of the Gamma MX have a shorter cut than the rest of Arc's jackets? I have the Atom Hoody, and the Alpha SV. They all have the drop back hem. I'm wondering, does the hooded version of the Gamma have this feature? I just feel like its pointless for a jacket that is 98% windroof to be so short. Don't get me wrong, I realize it is for climbing with a harness, but I am looking for an all around jacket for Backpacking, Skiing, etc.. So if the Hooded version has this, I am definitely sold, because this is an amazing softshell.

Thanks, Aaron

By:
February 26, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Gamma MX hoody does have a longer bottom hem, and drop back, than the jacket version...

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
February 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome piece of gear!

By:
February 2, 2010

Alright, so I was new to the concept of a softshell, but after talking with backcountry's (surprisingly with the quality of standard customer service online) EXTREMELY knowledgeable and helpful staff I picked up the Gamma.The night it arrived on my doorstep it was 6F and I was going out on a trailrun. I ripped the softshell out of the packaging, threw it on over my fleece and started out. First impression was fantastic. This thing breathes extraordinarily well, and handles wind fantastically.I have never been more pleased with any piece of gear that I have ever owned, nor has it performed BEYOND my expectations for it. This thing is great in the cold, looks sharp around town, and cuts the wind like no other while being way more comfortable than a hardshell. This is my go to piece since my first run with it and will eternally be in my stash when heading out to the back country.

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

I'm interested in this softshell, but wondering if it is

I'm interested in this softshell, but wondering if it is asking too much to backcountry ski, resort ski, rock and ice climb. Would this jacket be better than going with a top o the line hardshell like the marmot exum/troll wall, both of which I already have, or would they breathe better...due to the enormous pit zips.

By:
February 11, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've used my Gamma MX for all these things (and more). Of course, anytime you want one piece of gear to cover all conditions, something won't be quite ultimate. That being said, I've never worn another jacket that is as versatile (I've been wearing the Gamma MX for 8 years). If you already have a hardshell, put it in your pack for the really cold resort days, when the MX works great as a layer. You'll get more use from this than most any other gear you own.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
February 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

This is a great jacket, but personally, I prefer a hardshell when I am on the slopes. The Gamma MX is water-resistant (but not waterproof) so in prolonged rain or wet snow it won't keep you completely dry. It is on the shorter side, and has no powder skirt. It is more of an athletic cut, so there's not a whole lot of room to layer underneath it. It blocks most (but not all) of the wind, so lift rides can get chilly. It can be used as a layering piece, but I would use it more as a midlayer (particularly if it's wet, windy, or bitterly cold).

But I still love this jacket (even though I don't routinely use it as an outer layer on the slopes). It breathes really well, provides decent warmth on mildly cold days, is well-made, and has a very useful pocket configuration. It's great for most aerobic outdoor activities, and would likely be good for climbing (especially since it is fairly fitted). But if I were going skiing/boarding with it, I would be sure to also have access to my hardshell.

By:
February 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

In my view, this jacket is a little bit too lightweight for resort skiing. I just purchased it this week and have been wearing it in 30 degree weather with an R1 fleece underneath around town (not yet for any athletic endeavours). I would think you'd want a shell over it to help block the wind.

By:
February 11, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Gamma MX Hoody - Circa '06

By:
January 3, 2010

I purchased the GMX hoody around '06 (still Canadian made) and have used it for the past three or so years for trips out west and basically an overall winter jacket. I wear a medium in the majority of jackets, but the M was too tight in the chest, so I opted for the large. Fits me perfectly (5'10", 175). I have been at the top of Sugarbush in -20 windchill and this bad boy has held up (with layering of course). This jacket comes water resistant, but after a little...it is recommended to apply some sort of softshell water repellent to it. I used Grangers G-line Soft Shell and it worked fairly well for six or so months. Due to this shell being fairly thin, and soft, I have ripped the sleeves in four different places. I have pieces of duct tape currently covering the rips, but the fact that it has basically given up is why I knocked it down a star in my review. I'd be naive in thinking this jacket would last forever, but after three "seasons" (I live east and go west 3 or so times a year), it has started its decline. Don't get me wrong, I loved this jacket, but I'm definitely going to go with a hardshell for my next purchase. This will, however, continue to stay in my arsenal for warmer days on the slopes.

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

How does this jacket compare to the Mammut Ultimate Hooded Softshell

How does this jacket compare to the Mammut Ultimate Hooded Softshell Jacket? Any/all insights appreciated. Thanks!

By:
November 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

high tech sweater

By:
May 30, 2010

The jacket is beautifully and durably made. I have been wearing mine maybe 12 days a year (of 100+ total) for over 6 years. Only some color fade in wear areas. But the scholler fabric is not that special, IMO. In the cold wind, it is very cold. Won't work when wet western snow is falling. In the heat or during effort, it doesn't breath that well (compared to a goretex hardshell). So it is like a high tech sweater,not usedful in that many conditions, needs better windproofing and breathability to be what it claims to be, not even considering snow fall days, again, IMO.

Was this helpful? (0) (2)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: September 17, 2010 by:

By:
September 17, 2010

Not trying to be confrontational here, but there is no way a gortex hardshell breathes better than a softshell. Just doesn't happen.

Flag

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Hello Backcountry! Can anyone (users or staff) put the 2010 Gamma

Hello Backcountry!
Can anyone (users or staff) put the 2010 Gamma MX Hoody, in a size Large, on a scale and tell me the weight? I know its 595 in the medium, but would really like to know the weigth for the large!
(I dont care whether its oz or grammes, I'll just find a converter)
Also, im 5 ft 11 in, 190 lbs, would the Large be the size to go for?

By:
November 19, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

mtn31, thank you very much, such info is VERY hard to find on the internet! The new MX lost some weight then, the old was 1 lb 5 oz in a medium!

By:
January 9, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

just bought this jacket in size large - weight on my postal scale is 1 lb 4.5 oz - without paper tags

By:
January 5, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Thank you very much rya, i'll go for the Large then. My local store should be having a 40% sale soon, maybe with the MX soon, so it will fit into my student budget ;)
Did anyone know the weigth in the Large size?

By:
January 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i'll answer you. If I had seen it earlier, I would've helped you out. Honestly, go with the Large. 90 percent of the jackets, shirts, hoodies, etc., that I own are in size large. This jacket- I got the XL and it fits perfectly (I'm 6'1 205 lbs). With you at 5'11" and 190lbs, the medium might be a little tight.

By:
December 31, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Anyone? :D

By:
December 11, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hello, I can't find this locally to try it on, so I want

Hello,

I can't find this locally to try it on, so I want to make sure that I get sizing right. I've talked to a couple sales people online and some say medium some say large. I'm 6-foot and between 170-180 lbs. My measurements put me around a medium on the arc'teryx size chart (hips - 39, waist 33, chest 38 (41 holding in a deep breath), sleeve 34).

Would a medium, like the size chart says, most likely be a good choice for me?

By:
November 8, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm in the large camp too. I started out with a medium on mine, but it quickly became obvious that I needed the next size up...too snug, especially with any sort of layering below.

By:
November 9, 2010

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I would go with the Large...It is form fitting with no stretch whatsoever. Also depends on what you plan to do with it, layering or worn by itself. Hope that helps a little.

By:
November 8, 2010

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

What parts use Polartec® Power Shield® Lightweight and

What parts use Polartec® Power Shield® Lightweight and what parts use Schoeller® Dynamic GNS—Nylon/Spandex blend? Also, what does "GNS" mean? Did Arc'teryx improve on the standard Schoeller® Dynamic?

By:
November 7, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ha Ha, I recently spoke with an Arc designer and asked about "GNS" he told me it was a designation they used to differentiate it from the original Schoeller Dynamic they were using and called it the
GNS: " Good New Sh*t"

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
November 24, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Only the chest pockets use the Schoeller. GNS uses less spandex (8%), which adds durability and decreases dry time.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
November 7, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Is this jacket tall enough for me? I am 6'5"

Is this jacket tall enough for me? I am 6'5"

By:
September 25, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

So the torso length will be long enough to cover my layers underneath this jacket? How's the water resistance? Will this keep me dry in light rain?

By:
November 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

So the torso length will be long enough to cover my layers underneath this jacket? How's the water resistance? Will this keep me dry in light rain?

By:
November 2, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 6`5`` 190lbs and have been wearing the gamma MX hooded XL for 5 years now (the canadian made version). Fits great, arm lenght is perfect. The design/spandex allows to keep the arms/wrist fully covered during ice climbing. There is just no jacket that fits me as well. I need to replace it now and will try the newer version, and of course some of the competitor ones (cheaper) and see if I stick to the gamma MX.

By:
October 28, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

The Gamma MX is a longer cut softshell from Arc'teryx and the sleeves are nice and long as well, being that it's designed as a climbing piece. It should fit great. Check the sizing chart next to the "options" box to choose your size according to measurements. Enjoy!

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
September 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Convince me to spend the extra money and get a gamma mx as opposed

Convince me to spend the extra money and get a gamma mx as opposed to the zeta. Seems like they are both mainly made of polartec powershield, hows the breathability for both? Is the gamma alright for varied things like trail running or hiking, even without pit zips?

By:
April 16, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Well, the difference is really the hood and the weight. At nearly half the weight of the Gamma, the Zeta is probably less warm. Some of the weight difference is accounted for in the hood, but that feature will serve to keep you considerably warmer also.

Since they're made out of the same material (and neither of them have pit zips) they probably breathe about the same. In my experience (with a different jacket) power shield breathes nicely as long as I don't get too warm.

Seems to me like the Gamma is built for worse weather and the Zeta is more of a multi-use garment.

By:
April 16, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I REALLY want a new Arc'teryx softshell but am wary of the

I REALLY want a new Arc'teryx softshell but am wary of the now-Chinese made models. In many reviews people have complained about a cheaper construction because of this. Is this model still Canada-made? Does Arc still make any Canada models? Lastly, can anyone compare this Gamma MX with the previous Canadian-made model?

By:
December 4, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ok, a few bad eggs for you; case 1: Gamma MX jacket made in China, laminated strip inside mesh hand pocket de-laminated on first use. Case 2: Griffon jacket made in China, laminated hem de-laminated in shop whilst trying on. Case 3: Atom LT hoody again made in China, also de-laminated on hem on both sides of on first use.

Bearing in mind this does not speak for all of their gear made in China but 3/3 is not good odds.

As for repairing I made the mistake of using seam glue with the Gamma MX, but for the griffon and atom I just took my time and gently ironed the hems back down and works bloody brilliantly and in the case of the Griffon I found I had stuck it down better than the original manufacturing process.

My only advice is buy with confidence, but seriously check and re-check the gear on delivery for any defects.

By:
December 10, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I can't tell which is made where with the exception of the 'Made in' tag.

Not to mention Backcountry.com's awesome return policy; You can't go wrong!

By:
March 20, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This jacket IS bomber, I love, and that's why I took the time to stitch it up when the crappy seams came undone after my first trail run with the thing. However use it for everything from dh skiing to running, so well worth the 5 mins it took to fix it up.

By:
February 15, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Same here. I have both Canada and China made versions of this jacket and there is NO difference at all. Buy with confidence.

By:
January 11, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Arc'teryx gear is of the highest quality, no matter which of the 16 countries they use to manufacture, is listed in the label. China-made complaints are baseless if quality is at question.
As for comparison: the new fabric is quicker to dry, has a softer feel (but the same durability)and the same fit and stretch. You'll love this jacket...

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
December 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (4) (0)

Flag

This jacket is amazing, buy with confidence, I have Arcteryx made in Canada jackets and no difference with made in China. Great look, best results with lightweight top long underwear. This jacket is more lightweight than Hercules but really do the job. I loved and you will too if purchase it.

By:
December 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I have a GAMMA MX JKT, it's last year ver. I love it but

I have a GAMMA MX JKT, it's last year ver. I love it but I want a Hooded type. I know that New GAMMA MX has changed new Polartec Power Shield fabric.
Could you let me know what is the difference point in detail for this material.
Which is warmer?
Which is lighter?
Which is thicker fleece?
Which is more wind-proof?

By:
November 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Arc'teryx Gamma MX Softshells: The Legend goes on!

Vancouver, B.C – For more than six years the Arc’teryx Gamma MX Jacket and Gamma MX Hoody have set the benchmark for Softshells: the classic made of Polartec® Power Shield® is a legend. Thanks to their comfort, durability, and moisture shedding outer face, the Gamma MX has won many tests and remains unrivalled. None-the-less, the Arc’teryx product designers have concluded that the time has come for an overhaul. So, here comes the fabric new legends are made of!

The Gamma MX jackets are Softshells made for alpine conditions and provide outstanding mobility. They offer reliable weather protection and exceptional abrasion resistance. The new Gamma MX models are made of renowned high quality and durable Polartec® Power Shield® Lightweight Material combined with Schoeller® Dynamic.
In comparison to the previous material, made of 36 % polyester, 49 % nylon and 15 % spandex, the new Polartec® Power Shield® Lightweight is made of 50 % polyester, 44 % nylon and 6 % spandex. The new material is just as durable and tough as its predecessor, and of course just as water resistant. Thanks to a complex dying process, the colour hues of the new material are much more radiant than before.

The new look of the Gamma MX also brings some other changes. The women’s model is a bit shorter with a trimmer fit. Additionally, the jacket is equipped with a discreet chest pocket instead of the two roomy chest pockets of its predecessor. The men’s model sticks with the chest pockets, while making the jacket a uniform colour (instead of the previously used offset colour hues).

The Gamma MX Jacket keeps its collar, while the helmet compatible storm hood remains with the Gamma MX Hoody. So, if your Gamma MX looks like it’s served its purpose after years of use, you deserve the new worthy successor – here it is!

By:
February 25, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The difference between the new and old Arc'teryx Gamma MX is mainly in the face fabric. They are equally warm (same liner fleece thickness), and wind resistant (blocks about 90%). The current Gamma MX Hoody is a touch lighter, and dries more quickly, if it does get wet.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
November 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How does the fit of this compare to the Sigma AR? I have a Sigma

How does the fit of this compare to the Sigma AR? I have a Sigma AR in Large, and it is just about the right size, though a little too short. I am 6' 0" 175 lbs.

By:
October 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Arc'teryx Gamma MX has a bit more length than the Sigma AR(I want to say about 1.5 inches)The large in this jacket will fit you really well, and it's a good deal more breathable,stretchy, and lighter than the Sigma. Enjoy!

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
October 16, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How does this compare to the Arc'teryx Hercules hoody? I

How does this compare to the Arc'teryx Hercules hoody? I realize the Herc has a hi-loft interior, so should I expect it to be warmer than an MX? Does the MX compare to bc's Welder?

By:
September 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Some clarification on the previous reply about the Arc'teryx Hercules hoody vs. Gamma MX. The Hercules does have a DWR, and blocks about 60% of the wind. The Gamma MX is better as an outer layer due to weather resistance, but for mild conditions, the Hercules stands up. Hercules is cut to fit really well under hard shells, as insulation.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
September 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

The Hercules is meant as a mid-layer insulation piece. It does not have the DWR treatment that softshell like the Gamma MX has, so will not be as wind/weather/water resistant. It's meant to be under a shell, so breathes really well and will work better as a layering piece under a shell than a softshell would.

When you layer a softshell underneath a hardshell neither breath properly as they're both meant as outer pieces.

But a piece like the Hercules underneath a hardshell will provide great warmth while being much more breathable when you're exerting.

I have a Hercules (and the lighter weight Griffon) that I use heavily for backcountry touring. They're great pieces for that because of how breathable they are making them great at dumping heat on the ascents. Because of their hard faced outer they shed snow and precip better than a traditional fleece or midlayer if you do drop your shell. They don't cut the wind very well though (you can blow right through them), so when it gets cold the shell comes back on. They make a much better part of a shell-based system than a softshell though.

By:
September 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: ARC0880

2009 Model No Longer Available

But don't stress, we have the latest model in stock.

Arc'teryx Gamma MX Hooded Softshell Jacket - Men's

Arc'teryx Gamma MX Hooded Softshell Jacket - Men's

Research other out-of-stock versions:

my favorite just got better

5 star rating

By: Greg Hill April 1, 2010

Just got a new MX and this thing is better than ever. Lighter, they removed excess softshell behind the pockets and replaced with mesh. Such a good fit, more...

Much Love

5 star rating

By: Brandon Carlile September 18, 2009

As a longtime devotee of the Arc'teryx Gamma MX (I've been wearing them for 7 years) I'll give some insight to the new version. Fit is basically more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
Polartec Power Shield, Schoeller Dynamic 
Fabric Waterproof Rating:
water-resistant 
Venting:
none 
Powder Skirt:
no 
Pockets:
2 hand, 1 chest, 1 arm 
Hood:
yes 
Weight:
21 oz 
Recommended Use:
climbing, hiking, backpacking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
lifetime