Arc'teryx Bora 95 Backpack - 5250-6040 cu in - 2007 BCS

All around great pack. I have only taken it out one winter night, but I had a good amount of weight inside and it carried very well on my back. I would highly recommend this pack only if you have a large load to carry. If you do this is your pack.

Bought this pack for a replacement of a North Face Snow Leapord that was about 20 years old and has hundreds of miles of use. I was initially concerned that it would fit; I am 6"7" tall. I recently used it in the North Cascades bushwacking over 100 miles of down trees and snow covered passes. It performed well. The straps and belt is comfortable (after I got the adjustment right). The organization of the pack is excellent with a large outside pocket for those often used items. I recommend and look forward to many years of use!

This pack is perfection all around. The pack is very comfortable with loads up to 65 pounds, but on an overly ambitous snow shoe trip, I found out 75 pounds was over the limit for this pack, not to mention 99% of the backpacking community. Arc'teryx has exeeded expectations on this pack from the development of the hip belt, to the suspension, to the water proofing. If you are trying to choose between the Gregory Denali or the Arc'teryx Bora 95, I would put my money down on the Arc'teryx. Both are excellent packs; I just happen to prefer this pack. You cannot go wrong with this pack and will not regret it!

I just used this guy on a 2100 mile road trip, and to say the least I could hold enough stuff in this pack for 6100 miles. It is huge, definitely more than I needed, but it was great to be able to carry everything on the nights that the car was left behind. It is truly comfortable, is easily accessible with multiple access points. Arc'teryx once again has created another great piece.