Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 41 Reviews

Arc'teryx Bora 80 Backpack - 4390-5000cu in

Available Colors / Styles

Deep Blue
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Arc'teryx dedicated the Bora 80 Backpack to keeping you comfortable during multi-day trips with tons of gear. Dual aluminum stays and Thermoformed shoulder and hip-belt straps ensure maximum comfort and support when you really load up this giant backpack. Arc'teryx integrated a large front pocket, sleeping bag compartment, and side access to keep everything organized and accessible.

  • Tough, durable fabric and double-layer bottom stand up to abuse; external DWR coating helps repel light rain and snow
  • Top closure makes for easy stuffing; side zip lends full access to pack's contents without having to unpack and repack everything
  • Dual 6061 aluminum stays and thermo-formed straps to give you excellent support and comfort while you heft your monster load
  • Thermo-formed hip-belt transfers the load to your hips and features side-mounted cinch straps for added stability over rugged terrain
  • Removable top lid converts to lumbar pack for short hikes
  • Separate sleeping back compartment helps keep contents organized, while two external daisy chains and ice axe loops let you attach plenty of extra gear
  • Six external compression straps let you adjust the pack's volume to accommodate varying load sizes
  • HydroPort opening lets you route your water-bladder hose through to the outside of the pack (water bladder not included)
  • WaterTight outer zips prevent melting snow and rain from dripping down the pack and sneaking in

Bottom Line: Big loads don't have to be uncomfortable to hike with. Just make sure you carry your gear in the Arc'teryx Bora 80 Backpack.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

Arc'teryx is the best

By:
January 20, 2009

this is by Far one of the most comfortable packs i have ever owned, i purchased it over a year ago and i have already used it on five backcountry trips. while on the AT this past summer we experienced a large thunderstorm while on the trail and the bora held up great. the whole pack is not water proof but the sleeping bag compartment is and as for the rest of my stuff it actually stayed pretty dry considering the circumstances. overall awesome pack very tuff and i think you could pack all your gear and still have room for two kitchen sinks

Was this helpful? (7) (0)

Flag

My Dana Designs Terraplane has exceeded all expectations for

My Dana Designs Terraplane has exceeded all expectations for the past 20 years. However, it's finally time for a new pack. I've got an unusually long torso for my height so the Bora sounds ideal. I have a few questions:
1. What is the best way to secure crampons to this pack? Assume I've got an ice axe secured to the pack as well. The daisy chains don't appear centered. Just go with axe on one side and crampons on the other and use other gear to create balance? Anyone had success centering the crampons on this pack?
2. As my Dana was exquisitely crafted pre-water bladder days this will be the first time I purchase a pack with a bladder pocket. What advice on bladder manufacturers / sizes / setups can you offer for use with Bora?

Many thanks!

By:
April 30, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

As for the water bladder, I have a Bora 80 paired with a Camelbak Omega 100 oz bladder. It fits perfect, I have the line running out of the pack and through the loops on the shoulder straps.

By:
May 16, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yep, ice axe on one side, crampons (definitely with a case) lashed on to the compression straps on the other. I'm not sure if you've ever seen the way the water bottle pockets on the Bora work, but screw bad opinions, these are the only way to go. I carry at least 1 40oz Nalgene in one and could carry another in the other pocket just as easily (and I can reach them on-the-fly). With the hood- I usually use it for other stuff, like my rain gear.

By:
April 30, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Dana is still designing packs, if you're interested in another great pack from him. He formed Mystery Ranch after he sold Dana Designs to K2.

http://www.mysteryranch.com/learn/dana-gleason

By:
April 30, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

You're correct: the daisy chains are not centered. Ice axe on one side and crampons on the other is doable, but definitely use a crampon case or you may whack your elbow on the spikes. There's really no way to center them on the pack without using some long straps from the chains to the center. However, that would interfere with access to the outer pocket.

The Bora 80 keeps the water bladder in the top lid, not in the pack body, so you're slightly restricted as to how much you can carry in there. I always used a 1 liter bladder and can't imagine that anything bigger would fit.

Remember that the Bora is an older pack design that has been replaced by the Naos and Altra, so it won't necessarily have the newest and greatest innovations from the last 5 years or so.

By:
April 30, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Awesome Pack

By:
May 16, 2012

I did a 10 day 121 mile trek in New Mexico and this pack was AMAZING. I just kept packing and packing and it never filled up. I ended up with 94 lbs and the weight distribution of this pack made it feel more like 50. Only problem was that the string on the zipper broke and I had to fix it with para-cord.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

What is the best Hydration Baldder for the Arcteryx Bora 80?

What is the best Hydration Baldder for the Arcteryx Bora 80?

By:
March 1, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

My 2 l Source bladder fits perfectly in the upper compartment. I'd prefer one along the back, as this makes the lid too heavy, but the benefit is getting all the water out more easily.

By:
May 9, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I agree with Mike. The osprey Bladder has a frame, which is meant to rest along your spine. This does two things: it keeps the weight of the water next to your back, as well as gives the bladder shape so you don't get a funky shaped bladder weighing you down. Also, it has a magnetic clip feature that is super nice. I have the 2L and the 3L, but I rarely use the 2L. I find it to be too small. Here is the link so you can check it out yourself: http://www.backcountry.com/osprey-packs-hydraform-hydration-reservoir Hope that helps!! Good luck and be safe out there!

By:
March 1, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I prefer the Osprey Hydraform but you will get many different answers to this question.

By:
March 1, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Climbing Mt. Rainier

By:
March 23, 2009

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag Zoom

2 Comments Last Comment: February 23, 2011 by:

Nice! Where is that on Rainier?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
February 23, 2011

Great shot... !!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Arcteryx Bora 80 backpack

By:
April 29, 2010

This is the third big-load internal frame pack I have had, the previous being North Face and Gregory. Those were good packs. The Bora, however sets the bar of craftmanship and workmanship even higher. Hands down, the best made pack I have owned. Big-load comfort and control is excellent. Shoulder straps are strong and super comfortable right out of the box. The hip belt gets there, but there is a definite break-in period. Also, Arcteryx has on their website detailed instructions with photos on how to custom-fit the pack to one's own contours. Had the pack out in one torrential downpour, only a very small amount of water got in, through the zippers where the trolleys meet. Access to the interior through the side zipper is good, and the huge kangaroo pouch holds all the quick access needs like raingear and snacks. The lower pull-out side pouches are good for water bottles, but their purse-string closures do not keep water out. It would be a good place for a GPS or small camera in dry weather. Like most packs, the strap-on lid doubles as a lumbar pack; this one is large and comfortable.
All in all, the finest pack I have ever owned.

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

is it waterproof or water-resistant? would my down bag be ok

is it waterproof or water-resistant? would my down bag be ok in the occasional light drizzle or short periods of heavy downpour without a packcover?

By:
January 5, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i've had a bora 65 for several years and if I'm not mistaken the bottom compartment is does not have the water resistant/repellent stuff - regardless I've definitely had water seep through the bottom when I've put it on the ground at base camp for extended periods of time in wet conditions. I've never bothered with a rainfly though with over 400 days of use and no shortage of downpours, just put your down bag in one of those handy event compression sacks and you won't have to think about it. Water can get in the brain though so be smart with what you put in there/how you put it in there.

By:
February 25, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Bora is going to be water resistant to a light rain. If you're worried about your down bag getting wet, I would suggest two things.
1. Get a waterproof suppression sack for your sleeping bag.
2. Look at the Arcteryx Naos 85, it is a waterproof 85 liter backpack.

By:
January 5, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best Pack Available

By:
August 27, 2011

Ordered this pack just over a year ago from Backcountry. I needed a new expedition pack for a season as a Backcountry Ranger for the Forest Service in Northern Idaho. After marinating on it for weeks, I finally settled on the Bora 80. Since then, I've had it in many environments (from ID and MT pine forests, Colorado Plateau, and Alaskan Tundra) and it has surpassed any other packs I've seen. With its double wall construction, you could practically throw it in a creek and expect it to stay dry. The outer pocket is great for storing gear that you can access in an instant, such as your rain coat and pants. Top loading is pretty standard for packs these days, but the Bora's side access is indispensable. Recently, the pack has spent an entire season with me in Denali NP, and it has held up superbly to the nearly constant rain and bushwacking. The only time my belongings got wet was when I opened the pack to access them, which was kept to a minimum thanks to careful planning and the side zipper. The harness system can also adjust in almost every way you'd like to fit nearly any body type. I do suggest breaking it in well before any extended trek that you wish to take it on. I've even seen this pack take a tumble down a hill and come out with hardly a scratch. The construction has also held up very well to all the bushwacking that my line of work entails (trail crew and backcountry ranger).

Pros:
* Extremely sturdy construction
* Side Access
* Nearly Waterproof
* Moldable Hip and Shoulder Belts
* Adjustable Hip Belt
* Adjustable Aluminum Stays
* Carries heavy loads with ease.
* Water pouches can carry any size bottle or other gear if you wish.

Cons:
* The Price of Arc'teryx is always a con. But unlike many other name brands, with Arc'teryx, you get what you pay for.
* I've heard many people say this pack is heavy. It is NOT a minimalist pack, which isn't a problem if you don't mind heavy loads.
* Rain seal on zipper of pack's brain wears off easily. On future models, I would suggest that they cover this top zipper with extra pack material.
* If there is such a thing as too much room, this is it. I find myself triaging my gear frequently just because with the Bora 80, you have room for the kitchen sink.
* I find the detachable brain to be too small for feasible use as a daypack.

All in all, this is the best pack I've owned. I've carried it on Resource work in the backcountry, trail crew hitches, and back country ranger patrols. The Bora 80 is a workhorse of a pack if that's what you want it for. It's also great for long recreation hikes or shorter ones where you expect to carry extra gear. It's extremely durable, nearly waterproof, and rides great on your back mile after mile. This pack alone has me shopping around Arc'teryx for a technical day pack now.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

3 Comments Last Comment: September 12, 2011 by:

By:
September 12, 2011

I just took my 3 year old Bora 80 on a quick 12 mile RT in the San Gorgonio mtns--SoCal. Didn't purchase the pack shelter based on sales rep comments on 'water repellency' and on line reviews. On the descent rain came in hard at 7500' for about 45+ minutes. I only had about 3 miles to left to trailhead and my car. Upon reaching the car I examined my pack, it was pretty 'moist' but contents were okay pretty much dry. Opened the brain and it had collected 1/2" of water!! Literally poured it out....needless to say I've since ordered the $50 pack shelter.....best be prepared.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
September 9, 2011

I have found the rain cover to be unnecessary but my pack is still relatively new. The zipper on the brain has a damaged liner from bushwhacking so a little moisture gets in but not much. If you expect rain that will be day in and day out for the entire trip or your pack will be sitting in the open for hours, you may want to get a rain cover. Also, you may just take the measurements of the pack and find a cheaper one than the Arc'teryx rain cover.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
September 6, 2011

I'm going to pick up this pack in a few weeks. Do you think a rain cover is really necessary with it or would it just be a waste of weight/space/money?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Can it carry skis? A-frame?

Can it carry skis? A-frame?

By:
December 19, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes. Carry them in a-frame and it will work

By:
December 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Bora 95

By:
April 20, 2011

Pack weighed in at about 75 lb. More comfortable than pretty much any other pack at lighter weights! This thing rocks.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

1 Comment Last Comment: April 20, 2011 by:

By:
April 20, 2011

I bought this pack for an expedition through the Cascades up in Northern Washington. I am 6 feet tall and about 175-180 lbs and the medium fit me like a charm. I bought the 95 version, but the 80 is constructed the exact same way. Arc'teryx always does an amazing job with quality and functionality.
Not sure if this size is the same way, but the water reservoir compartment is found under the brain. At first I was skeptical of this design, but now love it! When I have to stop to refill it, its very nice not to have to dig through my pack to get the bladder out. Everything on this backpack is very well thought out. The suspension and padding make any load seem light. If you have the money, BUY IT!!!

Flag

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Soulmate of Packs

By:
January 20, 2010

I have had several packs over the years - Lowe Alpine, Kelty, North Face... but the Bora is by far the BEST pack and I will never have another. At first, I was disappointed because I'm used to pockets everywhere. But in use - I give major credit to Arc'Teryx for coming up with such a simple, streamlined design. Less is more in this case. The main compartment fit everything I ever wanted to put in it, and nice access to both bottom and main compartments. The best feature, however, is clearly the suspension. It is the most comfortable pack for long hikes and extended backpack trips. This pack has been hiking everywhere from El Cap in Yosemite to the Cohutta wilderness in GA to the Arctic Circle and more - and it still looks great and feels good. You get what you pay for, and in this case - you won't be disappointed!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Which hydration system will fit the 10" x 10" zippered

Which hydration system will fit the 10" x 10" zippered "hydration pocket" in the Arc'teryx Bora 80 pack? Seems as though they're all too long (e.g., the MSR Dromedary 2.5L is 7.5"x14".

By:
December 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Yep, everyone is right.

By:
January 26, 2011

So if your lookin for a pack to haul your gear, your friends gear, your friends grandmother and your favorite bouldering problem around for any length of time look no further than this pack. It isn't light, and never pretends to be but I'll sacrifice a little weight for a comfortable freight hauler. The thick and wonderful hip & shoulder pads & frame design plus DWR zippers/material and standard Arc'teryx durability make for a great piece of gear. And the kangaroo pocket is awesome for wet shoes & socks that you don't want to put near your other stuff. I enjoy this pack.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: February 11, 2011 by:

By:
February 11, 2011

This pack is amazing! Everything he said is correct. I have had it for 4 years and still have had no cons. I love the water bottle holders on the side that allow you to get your bottles easily while hiking, the sleeping bag holder on the bottom is huge, and it has straps on the bottom that allow you to carry a tent or other bulky objects.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I'm going to pick up this pack in a few weeks. Do you think

I'm going to pick up this pack in a few weeks. Do you think a rain cover is really necessary with it or would it just be a waste of weight/space/money?

By:
September 7, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Just took my 3 year old Bora for a one night 12 mile RT in San Gorgonio mtns--SoCal. Never bought a rain cover based on reviews (and the number of times i've been in rain) and sales reps comments on water repellency. On the descent rain came in hard for 45+ minutes. When I got to the car and opened the brain it had collected about 1/2" of water!!! Literally poured it out. I had wrapped my wifes Nikon in my fleece beaney so it didn't get ruined. The rest of the pack was fine, but definitely moist/damp. Needless to say I've ordered the $50 pack shelter.....best be prepared!! (Still LOVE this pack!!!) I've had Lowe's and Marmot's and this pack blows them away!

By:
September 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Depends on what you're going into. There are definitely lighter weight alternatives to the Arcteryx covers. The finish and waterproof zippers on the pack itself do take a pretty fair amount of rain to soak through, but when it's heavy and consistent, or as the pack gets beat up and ages, it's nice to have the cover. I'm not much on hauling my pack into my tent to protect it at night, so when it's all opened up at camp, it's nice to be able to just throw the cover on it and lean it against a tree or rock.

By:
September 8, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you're going to the Pacific Northwest, you'll probably want a rain cover. Other places, you're probably ok without it. That said, they're pretty light and pack down very small so it may not be too bad to have along if there's a chance of a heavy rainstorm.

By:
September 7, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Get this pack!!!

By:
March 29, 2011

If you're a mountaineer, or a person that takes long treks... OR a person that likes to have a ton of gear with you... This is the pack for you. There is a TON of room in this pack. Enough for over a week on the mountain with ropes, gear, ice axes, etc. The pack is not light... but you can’t feel the weight on your back due to the awesome frame design. The hip belt, and shoulder straps are second to none. The brain area of the pack is perfectly sized for all of your "need right now" gear. Also, the full length side zipper is perfect for looking in your pack to snag an extra layer without having to unload your entire pack. All in all... This is a pack for anyone. It will be the last pack you EVER buy.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Im 16 and this is an intense pack, I want this to last me a long

Im 16 and this is an intense pack, I want this to last me a long time. How is its durability?

By:
April 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This thing is bombproof, and at any point if it fails you can simply send it to Arc'teryx and they will fix it! Just keep proof of your shipping. Their guarantee is amazing.

By:
April 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I throw it, drag it, grind it, generally abuse the hell out of it, and for the past six years, have yet to damage it. You'll outgrow or will it to your own kids before you wear it out.

By:
April 13, 2011

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

The Bora is a legend, its durability is unsurpassed.

By:
April 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Simply the best.

By:
January 8, 2011

I really don't have to say anything else that hasn't already been mentioned. I use this pack for anything long distance/days. It can take a beating on the trail and the plane.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

is this a good pack for ski mountaineeing? im tyring to find

is this a good pack for ski mountaineeing? im tyring to find a pack that i can use for both multiday ski mountaineering and also multi day summer backpacking trips.

By:
March 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The compression straps on the side of the Bora 80 work to carry skis A-frame style.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
April 23, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

There's plenty of room in the Bora 80, and it is a great mountaineering pack, but no ski carry. Maybe try the Arcteryx Arrakis 65, or even some of the packs from Osprey like the Aether or Argon models.

By:
March 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Couldn't be happier!

By:
May 30, 2008

I have taken this pack on several overnight trips in the cascades and love it. Lightweight and a great waist strap that doesn't dig in. I am 5' 11" about 160lbs. The waist strap is a little big but with it cinched all the way down it fits great. I usually line my pack with a 4mil construction garbage bag for our rainy cascade weather but so far I have not seen any moisture in the bag...even in the most torrential downpours.

Buy this pack...you won't be disappointed.

Was this helpful? (6) (0)

Flag

3 Comments Last Comment: April 6, 2011 by:

By:
April 6, 2011

Just wanted to chime in so readers, especially beginners, understand that packs are not sized to height and weight. They are sized to torso length, and this has NOTHING to do with height and weight. Get your torso length measured by a specialist at a specialty retailer like REI. If you know your torso length, that is the truly helpful piece of information that is needed here. Thanks.

Flag

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

By:
September 29, 2009

I am 5'10 and wish I had gotten the tall,but since it was a gift I'll make due with the reg. Bottom line best large pack on the market.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
August 7, 2009

I am also 5'11" and 160. Did you get the "regular" size?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I have just one question, and that is whether or not the Bora

I have just one question, and that is whether or not the Bora 80 is water proof? It says that it is weather resistant, but does it truly keep your gear dry?

By:
March 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you are looking for totally waterproof, then you really want a dry bag. For short hikes, one of the SealLine Boundary Dry Packs will work (http://www.backcountry.com/sealline-boundary-dry-pack), but some of them don't have a waist belt and this can be murder on the back. For longer hikes (or if you are hauling lots and lots of stuff) the SealLine Pro Pack 115 is a great dry bag, but still won't be as comfortable as a regular backpack (http://www.backcountry.com/sealline-pro-pack-115-dry-bag).

If you want a very nice, highly water-resistant pack that is just short of a drybag, the Arc'teryx Arrakis 50 (and 65) should be considered (http://www.backcountry.com/arcteryx-arrakis-50-backpack-3057-3661cu-in).

By:
May 31, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

is arc teryx going to come out with a new version of the naos 70 pack anytime soon? i think the noas85 is a bit to big.

By:
March 22, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Hey Ryan,

In a similar size Arcteryx, the only option that I know of is going to be the Naos 85 (item#ARC0426). For the extra $275 it's going to run you, you can buy a whole lot of dry sacks for your gear and one hell of a nice pack cover, but if you need it, it's as 'waterproof' as it's going to get.

By:
March 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Short of an actual dry bag with shoulder straps (usually very uncomfortable) the Arc'teryx Arrakis is the most waterproof pack you'll find. BC.com has it in the 50 L version here:

http://www.backcountry.com/arcteryx-arrakis-50-backpack-3057-3661cu-in

The biggest version currently sold is 65 liters, but I don't see it on this site.

By:
March 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Ok thanks. Are there any packs that you know of that are waterproof?

By:
March 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

No, it's not waterproof, but it does a good job of holding out moisture for longer and keeping your gear dryer than most.

By:
March 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

HEAVY EQUIPMENT HAULER

By:
September 16, 2008

Comfy and huge. I use it for mountaineering, and it is great. Easily carries 60lbs with no problem easily holds ice ax, tent poles, trekking poles, and other long items. very durable and weather resistant.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I am just starting in backpacking and i am looking for a pack

I am just starting in backpacking and i am looking for a pack some people in my family have told me this is the pack to go with but is there lighter options with the same durability and is it worth the money or is truely a great pack

By:
February 23, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Good question, because buying a backpack is a major purchase—perhaps the most important and expensive one you’ll make—as you get into backpacking. Firstly, I’ll say that yes, if you can afford it, an Arc’teryx backpack would be a fantastic choice. Arc’teryx makes top-quality backpacks that weigh very little, are comfortable, and are smartly designed; they’ll stand up to an incredible amount of wear and tear, so your investment will be a good one. That being said, you need to consider several questions as you decide which particular model is the right one for you.

The Bora 80-liter Backpack is truly ginormous; you could practically fit your pet pony inside it. This is something a large person could take on a lengthy, serious mountain expedition. If you’re just getting into backpacking, it’s very likely that you would do just fine with a smaller 50-liter or maybe 60-liter pack. That would allow ample space for overnighters or a 3-4 day jaunt in the woods. Look into the Arc’teryx Axios and Altra packs; both are available in this size range. And since any Arc’teryx pack can be fully tweaked and adjusted to fit your torso perfectly, chances are high that it will work well for you.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
March 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

There is no doubt this pack is well designed and of the utmost quality, a friend of mine has a Bora and the thing is indestructible. But, pack choice must be based on not only quality and features, but fit: just because a particular pack fits others doesn't necessarily mean that it is the right pack for you.

In this way, backpacks are a lot like boots, what fits someone really well may be uncomfortable for your unique body-shape. My recommendation would be to go somewhere where you can try on a series of packs, including the Bora, and see which ones fit you the best.

Personally, I find that Osprey packs fit me the best, (tall, thin) and they generally are lighter/cost less to boot. I use an Exos, but many of my friends really like the Aether. Both Osprey and Arcteryx have unlimited lifetime guarantees from the manufacturer as well as backcountry, and are of superior quality.

Also, although 80L is a great size for weeklong backpacking trips, if you mostly do weekend stuff, a 65L will weigh 2-5lb less and still hold everything you need quite comfortably. Try to evaluate the type of trips you will mostly be doing, and how lightweight and compact the rest of your gear is, and choose your size from there. (generally 90L+, multiday 4 season/ 80L weeklong backpacking/ 65L weekend backpacking/ 50L lightweight overnight/ 35L ultralight backpacking, full daytrips). If you use a down bag, silnylon tarp, torso length pad, and wipe with rocks, you might be able to drop a size/weight/price class. If you backpack with a synthetic 0º, 4 season tent, lantern, dutch oven and deodorant, size up.

Hope that helps
-Simon

By:
February 23, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Sick

By:
April 18, 2010

wow what a mule this pack is and i am still standing tall! Definatly check it out for long treks and expedition use, great comfort and great loading/unloading options well made durable worth every penny!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

is this a unisex pack? or is there a similar women's ve

is this a unisex pack? or is there a similar women's version?

thanks!

By:
October 21, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Altra is women specific but Arcteryx currently lists this as unisex. http://www.arcteryx.com/Product.aspx?EN/Womens/Packs/Bora-80#Over_60L

By:
January 8, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

There is a women's specific version (now discontinued) call the Briza.
The updated version is the Altra 62 (http://www.backcountry.com/arcteryx-altra-backpack-62-womens-3783-4394cu-in)about 2 lbs lighter, with panel loading. Pretty, sweet!

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
October 21, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Comfortable and Durable

By:
November 21, 2010

The comfort of this pack has already been talked about and it is true that it isn't surpassed. The load handling is also amazing. And the fabric is superior. But it is not a perfect pack. The biggest improvement Arc could make is to bring the weight down. I almost always use my Needle 65 instead because before I even put a shirt in the pack I've saved about 2.5 pounds - and my Needle is nearly as comfortable. Unless it is a winter adventure or I am on a work trek with 7 days of gear and work instruments, then I pass on my Bora. That being said - my Bora has seen a lot of slide alder and vine maple bushwhacking and is no worse for wear. It wasn't able to defend itself against a mouse on the hipbelt though. I'm 5'5" and got a short, but probably should have got a regular. If you don't mind the weight, this is an amazing pack.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Is the extra capacity of the Bora 95 over the Bora 80 worthwhile?

Is the extra capacity of the Bora 95 over the Bora 80 worthwhile? I have a daypack so I plan on using this one as a multipurpose pack. I recently took a 3600 cu. in. up Rainier, and needless to say it was grossly insufficient. I don't mind spending the extra $50 on the 95, but is it too bulky for mountaineering or worth the investment?

By:
September 15, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Have to comment on the Himalayan trek comment, or at least clarify terms. While there is opportunity to do expedition backpacking in Nepal, the traditional trekking routes are less than wilderness conditions. Most people would be hiking from trekking inn to trekking inn, sleeping in a bed and room that is spartan and smaller in comparison to the typical jail cell, eating from the same menu that the inn had last night, and will have tomorrow.

You don't really need a guide, just follow that path, but I hired a guide for safety as I was alone. His equipment was a change of clothes carried in a pack you might see between classes on campus.

I could expand on the reason for this, but I had the Bora 80 and it was way overkill.

By:
February 6, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you really need a massive mountaineering pack I would recommend the Gregory Denali Pro, it is the gold standard for high capacity, comfortable do-anything rig. I run a Bora 65 for my regular backpacking trips and it can easily do 4-5- days at full capacity in late season, the 80 is absolutely plenty of room for anything short of a Himalayan trek. Of course the main principle is that any capacity/structure you don't use is excess weight you don't need to haul, so plan accordingly. If you are a serious hiker/backpacker it's worthwhile to invest in 3-4 different packs for whatever your needs may be on a given trip.

By:
December 18, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Brandon is right about the Bora 95 being HUGE. Even the Bora 80 is a big pack, and maxes out around 92L in the tall model. I can honestly say that when I got my 80, I also tried on the 95, and immediately knew it was much more than I wanted to carry, both in terms of its size and the load it can handle (and I came down from a 100+L Jansport). For years, the 80 has easily handled many a trip of a week or more without any regrets from me. It's also incredibly comfortable with 50lbs or more on, as well as being virtually bombproof in its materials and construction. Good mountaineering pack, worth every cent.

By:
September 15, 2010

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

The real question is are you going to carry that much stuff? The Bora 95 is HUGE! Like, double the 3600 you carried. If you're going to be carrying massive loads, the 95 is your rig, but most trips, even extended winter trips, should be accommodated by the Bora 80. Remember, you will always fill your pack, no matter how big it is...

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
September 15, 2010

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Gotta be the foam...

By:
September 9, 2010

An incredible multi use backpack. As to comfort level....Wow! I have owned 4 different brands and this is way above any modern day pack on the market. Just got off a trip to wind rivers, 8th trip with pack 2nd with over 50#s, and the 58# pack felt like 25 pounds. Eight miles in and no fatigue at all and a comfort level at the hips that almost seems as though there is an anti gravity belt. A little on the heavy side but this is an indicator of the well built and solid foundation of this pack.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

What are the dimensions (LxWxD), in inches, of the Bora 80?

What are the dimensions (LxWxD), in inches, of the Bora 80?

By:
July 21, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Officially, the dimensions are L=29 3/4 W= 17 3/4 D= 10 1/4". That said, I just measured mine that's close to fully loaded (maybe 85-90 liters on a size large), and the dimensions I got were approx. 34x17 3/4x12". That width doesn't include the water bottle pockets, and the depth is with all my rain gear and softshell in the kangaroo pocket on the front.

By:
July 21, 2010

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Camp

By:
February 24, 2010

In the heath land of Kilimanjaro

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Fantastic (big) pack

By:
May 27, 2009

As one would expect (based upon the manufacturer and the price) this is a really nice pack. The main compartment is huge, without intrusion from the frame or the front kangaroo pocket (which itself is large and useful). The lid pocket is also large, and the lid is easily detachable, making it easy to take your essentials into your tent while leaving your pack in the vestibule. The side access zipper can be really helpful. The water bottle pockets are kind of strange, but a 32 oz Nalgene or 40 oz Klean Kanteen fit snugly in them, with little chance of them falling out (and one-handed access is not too difficult). The 6 compression straps are useful for smaller loads (or for strapping equipment to the outside of the pack), and there are also daisy chains and two ice axe holders. The pack is comfortable even with heavy loads, although it is important to get the right size and to fit the pack correctly (as described here http://www.arcteryx.com/pack-fit.aspx ). Yes, this pack is on the heavy side, but in my opinion the features and comfort more than make up for the weight.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

what's the torso length that it suits? I am 6'00"

what's the torso length that it suits? I am 6'00" is it Perfect size?

By:
July 3, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Its not about how tall you are, its more about the length of your spine. Follow the sizing chart above and you should be set.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
July 3, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Killer backpack

By:
July 5, 2010

Amazing...I got it for a 3 weeks trip to Europe..it is really comfortable regardless of all the stuff you are carrying. Very resistant, it was exposed to rainy and sunny conditions. No problems at all. Great backpack!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 145 lbs, 6'0" with a 30" waist, intending

I'm 145 lbs, 6'0" with a 30" waist, intending to hike 20 miles a day on the CT, with 50+ lbs of gear, food & water in my pack. Is this a reasonable expectation? Would this pack work for this?

By:
April 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Brandon, I paid $100 to swap out the hipbelt on my new Altra. My info from the rep is that ArcTeryx does not do free swapouts in the US. Not happy about that policy. Can you confirm or deny it?

By:
April 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The Arc'teryx Bora 80 is made for just such a trip. While it's a bit heavier than some other packs of this volume, the suspension, and harness system will actually carry your load so well that it may seem lighter overall. One suggestion, it seems like you'd be a tall, but need medium harness components. This is easy to swap out, and you can contact Arc'teryx to get the smaller hip and shoulder harness if, indeed, the ones on the tall are too big for you.

By: Backcountry.com Vendor Rep
April 27, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Beautiful Pack-Just Too Dang Big

By:
October 26, 2011

I spent the last year living out of the Bora 80 while traveling around New Zealand. The bag was both my mobile home and steady tramping partner. Let's just say it was a year of love. Unfortunately, our relationship was flawed from the beginning. The vertical frame design combined with the volume of the pack just straight up didn't fit my body. I'm about 5'7", fairly fit, and as far as i know, have no spectacular superficial oddities. It didn't matter if the pack was stuffed to the gills or only held a few strategic items, it towered over my head, pulled backwards from me and distributed the weight onto my tailbone/lower back. Hiking up hill was a b%@#h, let me tell you. I tried anything and everything to make it work. At the time, I was working at an outdoor gear retailer in NZ, and all of us tried every adjustment, but nothing could change the way the weight sat, simply because it is meant to be distributed up and it is just too long for my back. Wonderful, wonderful pack, though. So, just a caution to the ladies out there looking at this bag. The bag is like a dream, I mean really, but it takes a long torso to fill it properly.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: May 9, 2012 by:

By:
May 9, 2012

Sounds like you got the wrong size for your torso. I had to go with a small myself for my 16.5" torso. I originally tried the medium and it just wouldn't stay put on my hips (kept slipping down) and leaned back from my shoulders even when pulled tight. With the small, it stays on my hips better and doesn;'t pull back like you describe.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

What is the max weight this can carry? At least 70lbs.? How does

What is the max weight this can carry? At least 70lbs.? How does this pack compare to the Gregory Palisade 80?

By:
March 24, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you are asking about structural integrity and uniform load transfer, the pack will have no problem with 70 lbs. It's more of a question to ask the hiker.

By:
April 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

not a problem for the pack I would have to agree with Phil that it would out load most mortals!

By:
April 18, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've always thought that the Bora packs would be most comparable to Gregory's expedition packs - such as the Denali Pro. At least from an intended use point of view this seems like a better comparison than to the Palisade. Otherwise, I'd say it's pretty darn hard to do a direct comparison. Nothing is more important than trying the pack on, getting the pack fit to you correctly and then loading it up with weight. Especially at 70 lb loads, fit is going to be key and different packs will work better for different people.

By:
March 25, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This pack would have no problems with 70lb loads.

By:
March 25, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Arc'teryx Bora 80 Backpack

By:
August 15, 2011

Only have taken it on one trip so far. I carried 27kg in comfort. The funny water bottle holders worked well when walking but wern't great when chucking into the back of the ncar.

So far so great.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm going on a 8 day hike in October and I'm been looking

I'm going on a 8 day hike in October and I'm been looking at the Arc'teryx 80 or the Osprey Argon 85. I need some advice?

By:
March 12, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Always hit up your local gear shop and try them on for the best results. If you're lucky you'll also find an employee who knows what they're talking about too.

By:
February 15, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

try both on it really comes down witch frame/harness system fits you best i tend to be an Arcteryx guy but the ospreys do have some good things going on for sure.

By:
April 18, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best pack I have owned

By:
June 16, 2011

I bought this pack for an upcoming mountaineering trip to Colorado. This is the first pack I have owned that didn't give me any hotspots anywhere. I have used gregory, REI and osprey packs and they always leave me sore afterwards. Loaded the bora up with 50lbs and took it on a 10 miles test hike on the AT in SNP and I felt completely fresh afterwards. Most comfortable pack I have used. Get this pack

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

what are the hyration options?

what are the hyration options?

By:
May 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Depending on the year of the pack it's either a sleeve behind your back or in the top compartment.

By:
February 15, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The best and most sensible option is the standard bladder/reservoir + tube. You can carry at least a 100oz bladder in the sleeve.

By:
May 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Gold Standard

By:
December 18, 2010

As a rule I roll my eyes at the price points on most Arc'teryx gear, they make great stuff but not worth the price tag in most cases. This pack is the exception; it is simply the best pack I own (and I own a bunch), no question that it is the go-to pack for everything from shoulder season overnighter to longer hauls year-round. Structure, materials, comfort under heavier load, capacity, all are top notch. I bought my wife the lady's version as well and she retired her REI pack after using it one time, this is the real deal. Yes their jackets are absurdly overpriced and it's easy to get annoyed with Arc'teryx but their packs are absolutely first-rate, stand on me.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does this pack have a water bladder pouch and a hole to run the

Does this pack have a water bladder pouch and a hole to run the hose too?

By:
February 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Mine is in the top detachable top/waist pack. It's a two year old model I believe, maybe three.

By:
January 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

A hydrapak 70 oz. fits perfectly in the top reservoir sleeve.

By:
December 22, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The hydration pouch goes in the pocket on the underside of the lid in the most recent models, where a velcroed pass-through allows the hose ot come out. There is a rubber ring on the right shoulder strap to secure the hose. It's not ideal because the lid is so heavy when unclipped, but I find keeping the hydration bladder in the top makes drinking the last of your bladder easier. It fits a 1.5 litre bladder best I think, but I can squeeze in my 2 litre bladder if it isn't quite full.

By:
May 16, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have had mine a few years so it's likely an older version, but my bladder sleeve DOES ride down the pack against your back, not in the top.

By:
January 20, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The pack has a sleeve in the main compartment. I have this pack and have had no issues with the bladder sleeve configuration.

By:
April 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes it does.But I believe it is located in the detachable top. Some people find that configuation a little more awkward than a more traditional bladder sleeve running down the pack adjacent to your spine.

By:
March 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

All the other kids are just haters

By:
November 12, 2009

I got this pack about five years ago and the idea of water resistant outside material seemed relatively new at the time. My other buddies tried to make fun of me for buying such a new pack, but the laughter turned on them when they had to start scrambling for their little messy pack covers in the downpour. Rain, sleet, snow or accidental water spills, this pack withstood the abuse. As an instructor, it gave me the critical opportunity to stop worrying about the way my pack was, and help others deal with the trash bag / pack covering mess. Others are right, the pack is a little heavy, but the frame and padding is like the cadillac of backpacking.

On a sizing note, I have the men's regular, and I probably would be better fit in the small. I'm 5'11", about 180ish lbs, and about 17" torso length. The kangaroo pockets (the hip pockets) have been great for carrying mugs, thermoses, and MSR white gas bottles. I also like how I can open the divider to the sleeping bag compartment, and make the bag just one huge barrel - this has worked really well on my mountaineering trips. On summer trips, I can keep the two compartments separated, and still take on my fair share of group gear. The transforming lid into a fanny pack has really come in handy. It's a great way for injured participants to carry a shell and their own hydration when you have to split the rest of their pack amongst the group. The side zipper has also allowed me to stash away / grab layers rather quickly without having to spend an absorbent amount of time unpacking and re-packing.

Overall, its worth the weight if you're one of those who likes the extra doo-dads and the plush padding.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i want to hook my little two man tent somehwere convenient on

i want to hook my little two man tent somehwere convenient on my BOra 80, where is the best place?

By:
July 21, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Take it out of it's nylon bag. Stuff it down the roo pouch, poles separate,iside pouch,under overgear, vertical against the pack body. Easy access after a caning in avalanche or river swim for immediate shelter access while in the grips of the horror fumbles.

By:
January 21, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Does inside not work? This pack is quite large, there would be plenty of room inside for the tent. If it has to be on the outside, I would recommend maybe putting the tent poles on the side or across the bottom in the straps, and then putting the body of the tent at the top of the pack, inside.Pack the body & fly in the bottom of your sleeping bag compartment. You can do this by folding it & putting your sleeping bag on top. The pegs & poles will fit nicely in the outside front compartment.

By:
November 20, 2008

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Not that you would, but....

By:
December 1, 2008

You could take the kitchen sink with this pack. I have had this is freezing snow storms to extended summer hikes and it endures it all. This pack has excellent durability and weather resistance. The room in this pack is great plus all the available loops and attatchments on the exterior. The fit is good and comfortable even with big loads. It will take some getting used to though, at least it did for me. Check www.arcteryx.com in their pack fit guide section for fine tuning. This bag is recommended highly.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

where would i hold my two man tent on the bora

where would i hold my two man tent on the bora

By:
July 21, 2008

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If you don't want to put it inside the pack there are two straps on the bottom that you can use.

By:
January 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Down at the base of the bag (the sleeping bag compartment) it has two buckle straps that run vertically. These work quite nicely for holding a two man tent....you place your tent perpendicular to the pack and stap it in. It is also nice b/c when the tent is on your pack and you set it down, it holds your pack upright. Hope this helps. Pack the body & fly in the bottom of your sleeping bag compartment. You can do this by folding it & putting your sleeping bag on top. The pegs & poles will fit nicely in the outside front compartment. This way everything is self-contained inside your pack.

By:
November 20, 2008

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

What else can I say?

By:
January 19, 2011

I use this bag for everything. Backcountry trips, plane flights, and trips to the girlfriend's place to do laundry. It carries everything and the kitchen sink. If you fill this pack full for anything less then a week long trip, you need help packing. Super comfortable and highly adjustable. Everything you would expect from arcteryx! Stop thinking about it and just get this bag. Not one complaint in over 3 years of use.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

This pack is the bomb!!

By:
January 14, 2011

Comfort -check , access-check, features-check, durable-check i have been useing this pack for 2 years now and i have yet to have a complaint .

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Can't stand the hip belt!

By:
December 14, 2010

This a quality pack, but make sure you try it on with at least 50 lbs to make sure it works for your body. The waist strap is ridiculously thick and spongy. I've tried both small and regular hip belts and I have to cinch it down so tight it feels like I'm giving myself the heimlich maneuver. Otherwise it slides down my hips. Arc'teryx made the belt too soft and compressible, so it doesn't hold - and I've had silver dollar sized spots of skin chaffed off my hips from the belt. Bottom line - hike with it weighted before you buy and make sure you like how it fits.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Phenomenal!

By:
November 10, 2010

I own the Bora 65...I love every aspect of it. I didn't go for the 80 simply because I wanted to force myself to be more of a minimalist. As everyone has stated it's not fully waterproof but it keeps the important features protected - sleeping bag.

I walked across Spain for a month over 350miles with this pack and had absolutely no issues. Although I wasn't utilizing the entire pack because walking 12-20 miles everyday isn't fun with tons of weight.

Worth every penny! It was hard to go with the arcteryx at first due to being a fan of pockets, but with extra pockets comes potential for soaked gear. Go with any pack Arcteryx and you'll never regret it.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: April 6, 2011 by:

By:
April 6, 2011

Ripper I like your review and I wish more people would get what you're saying here. Somehow I get the feeling that people want to be "covered" by getting the biggest volume for the money they spend. Weight is a big deal when you want to or need to make big miles or climb/descend. Data check: I met 20 people last year leaving to walk the Camino Real in Spain and none of them carried a pack bigger than 30 liters. I climb most peaks in winter with a 52 liter pack. I carry 45 pounds of rock and ice gear in my 32 liter pack. When I needed to carry 120 pounds up into the Cascades, I stripped down to a 4 lb Mont Bell. Yes, suffering ensued. That's the point I'm trying to make for folks just startign out here. Weight is a drag, and it's a really good idea to limit your pack size in order to curb the weight. If you know you can make 24 miles in a day on the AT carrying 45 pounds, then those 45 pounds will feel so much better in a great pack. But if you don't yet know your performance and load limits, my humble advice is, start by enjoying the backcountry 60 liters a ta time--or less.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 4

Made For the Long Haul

By:
August 4, 2008

I've worn it for several days in Arkansas. It's heavy-duty, and a little heavy - ultralighters need not apply. Very well made. I really like the wet pouch, and the detachable lid is a snap to get on and off. The side pockets will hold water bottles, but be sure to cinch up the little bungees tight. They're really better suited for energy bars and snacks. You can pack a bunch of stuff in this pack, and it's comfortable.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

3 years old been thru hell

By:
December 22, 2008

my bora 80 has endured the impassable woods of westren nc . thickets so thick eric rudolph eluded the fedral govet for 5 years in them .
been out alot and in these times of economic uncertany I know that ill always have a home with my bora 80.
im still finding features with this pack that serve me well ive had to adapt to keep things organized by adding a compartmentd bag to my gear to keep small items accessable but the rig is flawless
I dont use 1/2 of the external strapping options but I imagine if I did id double the range of this thing relitively easily
I do wish arc teriyx offered some cylindrical bags for the sides but beyond that I cant see a whole lot o f room for improvement
well done
scott flues
scottflues@yahoo.com
asheville nc

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

What a pack!

By:
May 19, 2010

This is a monster backpack. I've had this pack a couple months and just got back from a trip into the Olympic Mountains in Washington. Loaded with around 63 lbs of gear, this pack performed perfectly. With light rain at the lower elevations and snow up higher, there was not a drop of water inside. It could use a small external pocket or two but you can just strap on a small bag if needed. Things you want to get at like GPS, camera, knife etc. can be attached to the waist or shoulder straps for easy access.

To those that say this pack is too heavy, I would say; there is a reason for it... this pack is designed and manufactured to haul crazy loads, comfortably. I’ve owned several packs over the years but this Bora 80 is the best so far, pricey but worth every penny.

The only thing I didn’t care for was the bright orange color of the inside liner. When you have it loaded to capacity and the top cover is sitting higher than normal, you have this orange band around the pack (mine is black) that looks a little odd… minor issue.

Those Canadians know how to design a pack!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Don't be cheap. Buy it.

By:
February 26, 2010

I've had this pack (or a version of it) since... 1998 ish? I've used it hiking the AT from Maine to Connecticut, all through Big Bend, most of the south central states, on down to Copper Canyon in Mexico. It's the most durable thing I've ever bought. I can't even tell you the stories this pack has survived. It STILL looks great- no plans to buy a new pack any time soon. It's a bit heavy, but doesn't feel like it when it's on your back. I can carry more weight than my buddies and feel like I have less because of the awesome suspension system. If it's too big, just take the removable pack off the top (or go ahead and take that extra Nalgene of wine with you). The pockets aren't built for holding water bottles, and you actually have to take the pack off to get to stuff, but that's like 60 seconds of inconvenience out of the hours that you'll hike in comfort. Get this pack, like me, and don't buy another one for 12 years. You can buy that other stuff you want later.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Party in the Phillipines!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
June 30, 2010

That's when the taxi man turned on the radio
and a Jay Z song was on
and the Jay Z song was on
and the Jay Z song was on

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Finally got one

By:
February 14, 2010

So I haven't been able to use this pack backcountry but I am more than happy. First, you can buy this pack from Hiltons tent city for 299 and backcountry wouldn't match the price.

I am 6'3" and 240 and I bought the tall as my torso is 20.5 inches.

The sleeping bag compartment is a must for me. Also being able to get to your gear without opening the top is a must. You can by the front or side zipper. The straps, hip belt and back pad are very padded and comfortable. This pack is a beast and is rugged.

I bought this pack for my month and a half expedition in the Costa Rican rainforest. I will be backpacking and sleeping in a hammock the whole time.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

99%

By:
June 2, 2008

Arc'teryx is so close on this one the design and materials are top notch. By far the most comfortable long haul pack I have worn. The only complaint is the retarded water bottle holders. If your not carrying a water bottle (i.e. a bladder in the pack instead) they make the small pouches otherwise useless. The water bottle holder should be removable. Other than that, stellar pack.

Was this helpful? (7) (1)

Flag

5 Comments Last Comment: September 15, 2010 by:

By:
March 5, 2010

I disagree. I consider them to be an idiosyncrasy and something that simply takes a bit of getting used to, not a design flaw. I've never found the pockets to be hard to access or poorly placed. The bottle slides right in, and to get it out, the trick is to wring it up from the bottom like a tube of toothpaste (even with a insulation jacket on it). No bizarre yoga stretches required to reach back for a quick slug. I also like the fact that you'll never have an issue with having the bottle work it's way out like you would with a mesh side pocket. Not to mention that trying to do so with a huge load crammed in your pack is next to impossible anyway. Others are absolutely right about multiple uses- you can let it hang, or tuck it in. Great for storing knives, compasses, snacks, etc...

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

By:
September 15, 2010

Once you realize the intelligence and functionality of the design, nothing else makes sense.

Flag

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

By:
May 16, 2010

I love the bottle holders on the belt - they're so versatile. I like to carry a fuel bottle in one and a drinking water bottle in the other (don't mix them up!). Othertimes I use them to hold a sweat rag, or even granola bars.

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

By:
January 25, 2010

Taylor: I mostly agree with your assessment of the water bottle holders, but I have found the water bottled puches useful for holding other items that I need easy access to. You probably know this, but you can tuck them away into the side pockets.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
February 20, 2010

I just got this pack and i would have to agree. they would make awesome drop pouches for just about anything. pouches FTW!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 4

This Beast of Burden is Awsome

By:
January 15, 2010

I've had this back for over a year and have taken it on 4 backpacking trips, most recently over Buffalo Pass in Colorado. This pack is very comfortable and rides really well when moving, the weight is distributed evenly. The construction is generally top notch and heavy duty. The zippers and fabric are burly! One issue I have found though is that the plastic brace near the top of the pack that supports the area between the shoulder straps is a bit weak and may snap...when I dropped my pack it must of hit a rock as mine snapped. When I returned the pack for a new one, I was told by the sales rep that he had heard a batch of these packs had isues with manufacturing but that had been resolved.Aside from having a ton of space, there are just the right amount of bells and whistles. I love the side zipper that runs fully down the side of the pack...I can quickly access my stuff near the bottom of the pack without unloading the stuff on the top. I also like the zippered large storage on the top rear of the back that can be accessed by water proof zipper...I keep my quick access necessities, like rain gear there. The placement of the water bottle holders are a pain in the ass...with the pack on, its not that bad to get the bottles out of the holder but its a pain in the ass to put it back in. It doesn't have exteriod pouches or pockets or mesh, but I actually like that. It makes the pack sleek. When I strap this baby down its tight and doesn't have crap dangling on it so I don't get caught on branches or rocks.Solid...I'd buy again or recommend highly.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great Pack... Heavy

By:
October 15, 2009

This is the most comfortable pack I have ever worn. It has all the bells and whistles, almost all of which have come in handy. The removable fanny pack is somewhat cool but it clearly adds a lot to the overall weight. I'm not a huge fan of the side-access zipper. Contrary to other reviews, I have no complaints about the water bottle holders. They are a little tight at first but loosen up with use. This pack doubles as a nice leg pad to elevate your feet and add some comfort. One very cold night I slept with my legs inside the pack! Everything about this pack gives me the impression that it will last a lifetime. My complaint is the horrific weight, nearly 7 pounds is a significant amount of weight.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: May 13, 2010 by:

By:
May 13, 2010

You're absolutely right that this pack will last a lifetime. I was talking with a friend the other day, and she told me that her husband has had his Bora for 17 years!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Sweet pack

By:
October 17, 2008

I used this pack hiking through New Zealand and Australia and it worked out great! Easily carries anything you can think of!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Overkill in a good way

By:
August 10, 2009

This pack has worked great for me in both the backcountry of Alaska and in the mountains of Colorado. The side access makes getting anything stored inside easy and the front 'toolbox' compartment is perfect for things you don't want touching anything (i.e. Trash).The only dinky feature I noticed was the plastic head-guard. The plastic snaped off the first time I used the pack, making me a little worried about the overall quality of the pack. Nothing else has happened to the pack and it works just fine without the head-guard. Overall, construction is excellent. The zippers won't snap (they are solid and thick), and the fabric is fairly water-repellant, but holds water after intense downpours. The sleeping bag compartment is double lined with fabric, providing a dry bag later.A great buy that I hope, and expect, to last a lifetime.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

I carried the Hilton into Havasupai

By:
July 9, 2009

My family and I had been planning a trip to Havasupai in the Grand Canyon for a couple of years. As a first timer to the reservation, I didn't know quite what to expect from the hike, but I had heard it was rather long. In my search for the perfect backpack, the Bora was at the top of my list but I just couldn't justify dropping the bills for a technical piece of equipment that might be more backpack than I needed. Well, I dropped the bills and I have no remorse. On a hike where I watched other peoples' buckles break or struggle to carry less comfortable packs with gear hanging off the sides and strapped all over the place, all my gear fit inside my pack and I was comfortable for the entire hike, in and out. The ease of access to the various compartments of the pack was perfect and the removable waist pack was optimal for day hikes. I rested easy during the rain knowing my sleeping bag was tucked safely into the bottom compartment which seems virtually water proof. Everyone warned me, "You're pack is too big. It's going to be too heavy!" Nah, it was just right. I was able to pack everything I needed and keep the pack lightweight and I stayed comfortable the entire trip. I'd recommend the Bora to anyone, novice or mountaineer.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Bora 80

By:
July 15, 2009

Excellent pack! I brought this pack to hike at Indonesia's Rinjani mountain and Malaysia waterfalls. These are places where you'll get caught in thunderstorms is a norm. This pack performed as expected, very little water seepage. If you want a fully waterproof pack then get the Naos instead.

As for comfort this pack is top notch. Provided you get the correct size. I'm 5'10 and medium fits me well. Two training hike all it takes to break-in the pack.

Only set back is, there is no provision for water bladder. I normally hike in tropical forest so I sweat heavily. Having to rely on two water bottles is not enough for me. If you wanna use a bladder you have to get creative eg. placing the bladder in the kangaroo pouch. Other than that it is an awesome pack; tad pricey though...

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: July 22, 2009 by:

By:
July 22, 2009

There is a place to put your water bladder in the head of the pack. The zipper pouch that faces inbored of the pack. It is not large but there is a place for your hose to come out as well.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

great pack

By:
November 26, 2008

my husband packed this thing to the brim and he was comfortably able to carry it. the padding in it is excellent and does not rub or create sore spots.

overall - a great backpack!!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

the Cadillac of its class

By:
May 8, 2009

After much research, reading up and soliciting of passer-by's opinions, followed by an in-store weighted pack test while browsing, I settled on the Arc'teryx Bora 80 for my long distance hiking needs.

While a bit overkill for shorter 4-5 day trips, I found the Bora 80's large volume convenient for quick and easy trail packing while on extended hauls. The Bora 80 comes with a few standards such as detachable top pouch which converts into a fanny pack for day hikes, separate bottom compartment for stuffing a sleeping bag and multiple straps for cinching down to stabilize the load.

Major Pros: first, thick padding and a suspension system which makes it the Cadillac of extended hike backpacks, while this does add to the burdensome near 7 lbs of weight which many complain about, it is weight I am willing to carry if it means comfort during my long days on the trial, and comfort is one thing this pack provides. Second: an easy-access large front pocket, which I found convenient to store all my clothes for the trip. Could also be used to store the days food and needed easy access supplies. Lastly the pack boasts a large internal space with minimal frame intrusion for easy packing, which also made it easy to load the cumbersome bear bin.

Sadly there are a few Cons: The first being the two side pockets which are shallow, making it easy for things to fallout unbenounced to the hiker, and poorly designed and thus difficult for mid-stride access to the gear that hasn't yet fallen out. The newer model has addressed this issue, but I am not sure how effectively. There is also no water reservoir to store a camel back, thus one must be rigged McGuiver style. The pack is rather pricey in comparison to other packs in its class, but Arc'teryx makes their gear by hand and stands behind their product, so you are getting a quality made pack for your money. It is one of the heaviest packs on the market, and while they put the wt to good use, 7 lbs is still a lot of weight no matter how you pad it. If you are looking to cut down ounces at every corner, I would pass on this pack. Being a solo hiker on many of my hikes, I am fairly devout to cutting back on weight myself, but a comfortable pack is one area I am willing to splurge.

As far as fit goes, I am a 5'8, fairly broad shouldered medium build girl, thus I had no problem fitting nicely into the men's pack, for more petite females there is a female version. The pack carries its load well and disperses the weight to the hips nicely.

I would and have recommend this pack to friends who don't mind a little extra wt for the comfort, After some 300 plus miles of 1 tp 3 week long hikes on the trail last year, I am still happy with my purchase and am packing it up again for another 300 miles.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Arc'teryx Bora 80

By:
March 23, 2009

Great pack! The most confortable "big" pack I have ever owned. Will easily carry everything for a week or more. The only downside is that this pack is heavy. I still give this pack 5 stars and if I needed another pack it would be my first choice.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Review Title

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 23, 2009

The thermoformed hipbelts on this pack carry this backpack and load @ 25-30 lbs lighter than anything currently in the backpack genre'. I have a 31" waist and this hip belt and v-stay suspension are a dream whether it is packed to the gills for 5+ day backpacking in Windriver WY or packed with gear for an approach to a multi-pitch this pack has minimal swing weight to rival its ski and technical smaller cousins. Bora: the flask of whiskey and the end of the day for pleasure instead of pain.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

20%
Reg $399.00
$319.20
20% Off, Regularly: $399.00 | Item: ARC0652
Size ?

No questions asked unlimited return policy

Free Shipping

Free shipping on orders over $50

57 in Stock
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Black, Short (319.20)
Deep Blue, Short (319.20)
Black, Tall (319.20)
Deep Blue, Reg (319.20)
Black, Reg (319.20)
Deep Blue, Tall (319.20)

Arc'teryx is the best

5 star rating

By: Brenton Cook January 20, 2009

this is by Far one of the most comfortable packs i have ever owned, i purchased it over a year ago and i have already used it on five backcountry trips. more...

Awesome Pack

5 star rating

By: Will Robbins May 16, 2012

I did a 10 day 121 mile trek in New Mexico and this pack was AMAZING. I just kept packing and packing and it never filled up. I ended up with 94 lbs and more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
[lining] Invista HT Ripstorm (210D nylon), Invista HT Ripstorm (420D nylon), Invista HT Superpack (630D nylon) 
Support/Suspension:
V-stay frame, molded back panel 
Shoulder Straps:
thermo-molded 
Waist-Belt:
yes, thermo-molded 
Hydration Compatible:
yes, hose clip 
Reservoir Included:
no 
Detachable Lid:
yes, with intergrated hip belt 
Access:
top, side, bottom 
Pockets:
2 lid, 1 front, 2 side water bottle 
Sleeping Bag Compartment:
yes 
Weight:
6 lbs 9 oz 
Volume:
(short) 72-81 L, (medium) 77-86 L, (long) 82-92 L 
Recommended Use:
weekend to week-long backpacking trips 
Manufacturer Warranty:
lifetime