Free 2-Day Shipping on Orders Over $50* – Limited Time Only

Snap into the Twenty-Two Designs Axl Bindings and carve with confidence at the resort and in the backcountry. The Axl gives you the legendary stiffness and adjustability of the Hammerhead and adds a free-pivot backcountry touring mode that allows you to tour longer and with less fatigue.

  • 2000-lb test cables, a one-piece molded scratch plate, and one-piece stainless-steel latch mechanism boost durability
  • Flexes at the boot bellows unlike other designs that give you a feeling of tip-toeing
  • Three cable-guide positions allow you adjust how active the binding is for a customized feel
  • Six-hole mounting pattern is wider and longer than a standard four-hole pattern, which transmits power more efficiently and offers extra-secure attachment to the ski
  • 2.4-inches of smooth compression spring travel mean you won't bottom out, even with hefty boots
  • HammerHeel climbing bars are easy flip up and down with ski pole
  • Reviews
  • Q & A

What do you think about this product?

Have questions about this product?

Much better but different

  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

Got these to replace some older cable G3s that I used for years. Initially they felt really stiff, much more like an alpine set up. On moderate terrain, I really had to force it and be on my game. The steeper stuff and bumps were GREAT! I ski BD Verdicts with T2 boots and while the boots are probably a little soft for this set up, they worked great. By the end of day 1 I was in love.

Great Binding, Great Company

    I've had these bindings for two years and truly put them thru everything. I tele'd over 70 days this past season in CO at Vail, Beaver Creek, Abasin, Breck, a trip to Jackson, and about 8 days of back country. The touring capability is awesome and a real pleasure to use, it would be nice to have two sizes of climbing bails, however this did not really bother me in use. Secondly, at the end of this season I broke one of the usheredheel bars


    • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

    My husband got these to replace some alpine bindings on his ~100mm underfoot daily-drivers. He had another set of skis mounted tele with some BD O1s, and he said that the switch to the 22 Designs was a night and day difference in control (he is by no means an expert tele skier). The shop mounted them and put the pin in the middle position, and he immediately felt that he had more control of his trailing ski, and a lot more confidence.

    Bomber Bindings

    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    Bomber bindings all around. Used these extensively for several seasons in and out of the resort. They're great going up. Plenty of range of motion. Switching between tour and ski mode is easily accomplished with the tip of a ski pole. Ice and snow buildup is not usually an issue unless the snow is unusually clumpy (think a big dump of cold snow and 45 degrees and sunny immediately afterwards).

    Downhill performance, is, as one would expect, fantastic. Super solid feeling and buttery, round, progressive flex. Very solid boot-binding interface. No lateral play and no issues coming out of the binding when things get rough. It is worth noting that these are very active bindings. In the least active position, they're about on the level of a Hammerhead at #3. Very light skiers or folks that are used to more neutral bindings may have a bit of an adjustment to make.

    Manufacturer has great service, too. After a few years of use one of my heel risers sustained a bit of damage and getting a replacement from 22designs was completely painless.

    By far, the best tele bindings I've skied. You won't find a better option for a duckbill binding.

    Thank You Idaho.

    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    Ever since being introduced to 22 Designs I have used their telemark bindings almost exclusively. All of my lift-access set-ups, including Rossignol Super 7 pow skis, have Hammerheads but it is the Axl that has impressed me the most. Although a little heavier than other telemark touring bindings, the Axls are the most durable, stable binding out there for backcountry enthusiasts plus they can drive any size ski. I have over 50 days touring and many more side country trips on my pair and they are going strong. Not to mention they are made in Idaho, USA. Strongly recommended and much more affordable than NTN.

    Thank You Idaho.


    • Familiarity: I've used it several times

    I used this binding this past winter with no problems. The touring mode works great. I had a couple instances when the boot popped out traveling uphill, but I suspect it had to do with ice and snow that I failed to clean off my boots.

    So far so good

    • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

    I'm limited in my use on these bindings but am crossing my fingers they I will have better luck then those listed below. The bindings are indeed made in the U.S., making warranty's easy to deal with, and they are a bomber design. If your into new school tele skiing, I have not seen a comparable binding on the market. The heavy duty spring kit is a nice option for further adjust-ability as well.

    Major Weakness!!

    • Familiarity: I've used it several times

    Why would the Empire engineers make a nice round defect just large enough for an X-Wing to blow up the Death Star? Crazy. Just as crazy to me, is that the Axl made it through the prototype stage, full production and release, and is still praised overwhelmingly, despite a massive vulnerability. I know this problem has happened to others, and it seems 22 Designs is aware as well. Got a spanking new T1 here from BC, and the Axl shredded it up. The reason is that the 'flex plate' on this binding is really embarrassing compared to how bomber everything else is. This flimsy red piece of plastic is supposed to protect the cables underneath and keep snow/ice out. All other bindings I know of have a nice FLAT dense piece of clear glass-like plastic screwed in here. But this 'flex plate' is only secured by the metal pin that chooses the activity of the binding; as in position 1-3. Now if you ski with that pin in the front, least active; there is a very good chance that with a lot of deep tele turns this sharp ridge in the front of the flex plate will slice apart the underside of your boot by the 3 pin area near the front. You can see another reviewer below where this happened, I'm sure we're not alone. Furthermore, the whole thing curls up and becomes useless as it is not secured in the back and the black plastic part that is on your heel knocks into it and curls it up. My first T1s lasted 11 years with Targa bindings; no problem. With Axls new T1s were chewed up after being used 3 times!! As always, Back Country was AWESOME and took the boots back under warranty, which is why I will buy gear only from them. Such a shame, as this binding really powers fat skis and the free pivot climbs amazing. Weak engineers must be the conclusion, as this binding is exactly like a great puzzle that comes with one piece missing . A piece of gear can only be judged by its weakest link. Just had a ZEN day on a loaner NTN, lifechanging, so perhaps I should really be thanking 22D

    Hey August, it sounds like whoever mounted your bindings didn't put the flex plate on right. They are supposed to be attached not only by the slic pin, but also the little triangle at the front. I can imagine that if the front wasn't installed, it would stick up and eat into your boots a bit.

    I have to agree with 22designs on their rebuttal, and take the opportunity to sing the praises of this awesome binding.I was on the receiving end of a crappy mount job when I bought my first pair of axls. I gave the guy the directions that came with the bindings, and he still managed to screw up the heel plate so the riser did not work, not to mention he had the skis set up with the pins in two different positions. However, he did manage to install the triangular metal plate under the flex plate. I have skied these bindings for years and never so much as dinged a duckbill. I have been skiing telemark for almose 30 years(!), and have enjoyed going bigger with the gear, but axls with pin up front is as far as this old school girl can go. These bindings are well loved in my gang of aging tele rangers because we don't have to fight the binding to get low, but the lateral stiffness and support are bomber.

    Have to agree with August West. Skied all last season (40+ days in the northeast) on 22D HH with new Scarpa T1 Race. No issues with the boot or binding. Switched to 22D Axl this season and had the mount done by a very respected shop in downtown Burlington VT. With about 15 days into the 2014/15 season, the area between the 3 pin line and the tip of the duckbill is coming apart. I will add this: I'm skiing this binding in the middle position, which is different from August, but with the same result. Very disappointed, and I recommend regular inspection of your boots, especially if you have a deep tele style. Boots are crazy expensive, and the T1 Race is shot after only two (well, one and a half) seasons. I would like to hear something more substantive on this problem other than technician/installation error.

    Axl hated Scapa T1's

    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    Love the binding but it ate up the vibram rubber sole on my Scarpa T1. From the 3 pin holes forward the rubber was destroyed on both boots by the plastic foot plate underneath........twice!!! 22 Designs not helpful. Aware of the problem but unable(read unwilling) to suggest an answer.

    I'm off to get another binding. Very disappointing.

    Can't use the Axl.

    Right on, see my review above. I was psyched this was made in the USA, but now I'm afraid that the stereotype of superior European engineering will ooze into my brain. Perhaps T1s should have denser plastic on the lowest part of the sole (no reason for otherwise), but it's mostly on the Axl. I suspect there are lots of people with this binding who would be horrified to look on the sole of their boot, and when that layer falls of, there will be poor power transfer as the duckbill won't fit snug. If I were a merchant I couldn't sell this product with a clear conscious, and if I were in the 22 Designs boardroom I would be making my lawyers aware of this.


    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    The binding is indestructible. I've skied this at resorts and in the bc since the bindings inception. I am yet to have any problem with them. A little heavy compared to other touring bindings, but if you like to tele with speed you need the stiffness that only 22-designs can provide.


    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    I have skied the Hammerheads for years and loved them. My wife skis on the Bombshells. These bindings ski just as well and the Hammerheads and the switch to touring is much easier. My only complaint is the engineering on the red rubber plate that goes under the boot. It has a moulded triangle shaped piece that is suppose to clip into the metal plate below. It does not stay clipped and this makes it very difficult to slide the boot in. I will probably have to shave it off. Also, you will need to have access to a printer to make the template for mounting. I had difficulty printing this as well and had to get the company to send me a PDF attachment to make it work. Considering the price and the mounting instructions printed on a good quality paper, I am confused as to why a simple paper template is not included.


    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    Took these out about thirty times last year mounted on my fat skis, maybe twenty times skinning and the rest lift served at a pretty steep local spot. Only on soft snow days though. Response and feel is outstanding, did some adjusting of the pin at first, but now it pretty much chills in the rear position. The pin that allows the free pivot of the toe piece for walking got a bit loose after some heavy shred, but was easy enough to retighten with a dab of red locktite and two allen keys. Also a bit on the heavy side, but construction is very stout. I'm a little rough on my gear and I feel confident these will give me a lot of worry free days compared to some lighter bindings I have abused in the past. Overall, very satisfied.

    Excellent, powerful, Made in USA binding

    • Familiarity: I've used it several times

    After doing research of what bindings to use with tour mode, my choice was brought down to 3;

    The Black Diamond o1, the 22 designs Axle, and the Voile Switchback . (Hadn't found the g3 Enzo yet)

    As I was putting the bindings a pretty wide set of skis (Unleashed hell - 111mm waist 140mm tip), I wanted as much lateral control as possible.

    I previously had Black Diamond o1's but agree with other users on the net that indicate there is a fair amount of slop in the hinge, and that the spring cartridges tend to change tension (second is an easy fix with some tape)

    When I read that the Axle and the Voile were made in the US, that made me more willing to spend a bit of additional money on them.

    Then I found and read the reviews for them at

    The result was me choosing the Axl due to its high turning power markings. I can deal with the slightly lower Touring markings, as a lot of what I do is at a resort (planning on getting out more in the future tho!)

    The Axle is a hefty, nice binding. The only drawback i've found to the BD is that it didn't come with a pre-printed mounting template - and the one provided on the internet needed some tweaking to print right on my printer (thank you GIMP/ignore margins/set pixle per inch indicator)





    Note - there is not a review for the new version of the switchback.

    Also see

    gotta get up to get down

    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    This is the only telemark binding I will use and here is why:

    98% of my time on skis I am in the backcountry

    100% of the time I want to have a binding that I am confident will not fail in the field

    100% I go up for the fun on the way down

    There are a lot of bindings on the market right now that offer a tour mode, but none of them offer such a responsive and active feel as the Axl.

    When I tour I am busting my Ass to get to the top so I can have fun on the down. So for me a binding has to perform on the down, not just be a walking machine. Conversely, if I get crushed slogging some stiff overweight setup up the mountain I won't have the legs to ski the line how I want. The answer, well I think it's clearly the Axl.

    The toe piece is made out of one solid piece of stainless steel and runs longer than any other telemark binding on the market. What does that mean? well it means that the ball of your foot, where most of your control comes from, is actually being harnessed more, so you have more control over your skis. Also it gives you more lateral rigidity so you can carve better. The spring that run underfoot and the cables that run along side give you the initiation and power that you are looking for to really drive your skis. Also the 3 pivot point options allow the rider to really dial in where the binding flexes to fit their unique style.

    I have used these bindings everywhere from brutally cold days in AK to wet heavy BC to the champagne powder of the Wasatch and have never had them fail. Occasionally snow or ice can build up under the toe plate, but taking my pole tip to it for a couple taps does the trick and then I am ready to be locked and loaded. There are no cheesy and unnecessary plastic cover plates that keep you from accessing any mechanical part of the binding so you can always give a few taps and be on with it. The Axl is hands down the rock star of all touring bindings

    gotta get up to get down

    Super Bomb Binding

    • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

    I've been through the ringer of tele bindings over the better part of a decade. I've been victim of spring blowouts, frozen tour modes, binding rip-outs and on an on. After such a troubled past, it was difficult to have confidence in making a turn when charging hard or being in sketchy terrain.

    The AXL restored my confidence in tele bindings. Unlike competitors, 22 Designs have always had 6 mounting screws from the start, so before I even rode them I began to have a sense of security in my binding. Additionally there is no lag in the mechanics between flexing your boot for the turn and activating the springs, which makes it a super responsive binding. This has been an issue in other brand models for me in the past. The tour mode rocks, easy to use and never freezes - check.

    As a side note, I've also spoken with the 22 Designs guys through email and was shocked at how quickly they responded and helped me out. Awesome dudes!

    My only gripe, which should be noted, is that they make different sized climbing wires HOWEVER they are not easily interchangeable. They have to be put on while the heel piece is being mounted, there is no easy swap out option, but this doesn't warrant a deduction in their 5 star rating for me.

    Bottom line: These bindings ensured the utmost confidence in my riding, are very powerful, and have a burly construction. Two thumbs up!

    22 designs

      Third season on the axles for more backcountry than resort. Love the binding's power in third position with spiffy springs. why not? You can free pivot on the way up. Do have to say I really loved borrowing my friends vector BC's mounted with Switchback two's the other day. I felt the switchback 2's had very similar power and feel, but the switch over was easier ( from tour to ski), and of course it's a lighter binding. Both american made which I like.

      I will say I've got a pretty big repair kit for my axles that I never leave home with out. First off though, I never switch back into ski mode with out taking off the ski and cleaning out the ice or snow build up under the lock mechanism. Locked in, it's bomber, but if you force the bar forward into locked mode with ice present you are risking bending or breaking the attachment point to the lock bar. Not good on a 3-4 day trip...

      So. I've broken a heel piece, I've lost the main pivot screw in front of the toe, and the rear transverse bar, the one I think the new crampon will be attached to, broke a spot weld at one end: I've replaced the pivot allen headed bolt with a regular 5/16" hex head bolt, with threads twice as long as the standard cap bolt. I did reassemble with a dot of epoxy, but I also watch it like a hawk.

      I've also seen the power pin almost work itself out in use. I bought an extra pin, for that 1,2, or 3rd setting, but because that aforementioned rear most transverse bar which broke spot welds ( happening on both skis, I found), I use 1/4" bolts in the third setting, with double nuts on to keep from loosening and falling off. So I have the bolt tightened down enough to mitigate the transverse bar failure, and I keep the supplied power pin stored in the first hole just in case I need it. I'm using B&D crampons with a lock feature so I don't have to hear any clicking while climbing. The axle changed up my skiing. I love it, but would buy the switchbacks for the next boards.

      Yes, I have been disappointed with the failure rate of a binding that is marketed as bomber. Seems it just breaks like all other tele bindings. Nonetheless, a good binding by telemark standards. A couple of points of you:

      - The "transverse bar" was changed in later production. I had the same issue and 22 Designs rebuilt my binding to latest spec for a hefty fee. Well out of warranty.

      - The heel throw has also changed design to attempt to address breakage. I also snapped one. Important tip is to ensure that you are not winding the spring tension too tight. The heel throw should snap into place, but does not need to be any tighter than that. Best to carry a spare, as I am sure you do. Couple of guys called Bluebird Day Gear are prototyping a universal metal heel throw to address this issue.

      - The Axl crampon is a dog. The tabs that hold it to the binding have bent on both trips I have used it on. Yesterday they bent so bad that the crampon detached. Sounds like you are having more success with the B&D crampon.

      I'm looking for a solid back country binding...

      I'm looking for a solid back country binding for my tele skis, and I have always heard great things about the axels and always thought they would be my second pair. But reading some of these reviews makes me want to try out the Voile Switchback X2s. I have been riding the 22 degisn bombshells (female hammerheads) for 2 years and love them at the resort but it sucks adjusting them in the backcountry. I'm a female with a super small boot(size 7) and am just curious which binding would be better to go with?

      Hi Jen, the 22 Designs Axl Telemark Binding will be super easy to use in the backcountry. You will be able to switch it back and forth between touring modes hands free and the climbing bars will make uphill skinning a breeze. I like this more than the Voile Switchback X2s, however, that's also because I'm really aggressive. I would prefer the Voile's more if I wanted a softer binding. Bottom line is, both bindings will be super easy to use in the backcountry, the Axl is a higher end binding that will give you the stiffness to rip harder and faster. If you liked the bombshells, then get the Axl's.

      If I want an active free-pivoting binding,...

      If I want an active free-pivoting binding, is this the way to go? Currently skiing the Bombshell but I hate it when skinning up (but I love it on the way down).

      Hi right now I have the BD o3 and just...

      Hi right now I have the BD o3 and just hate them and trying to deside between the NTN freedoms and some 22 designs. Any suggestions.

      Just bought 188 Megawatts, have Scarpa ECO...

      Just bought 188 Megawatts, have Scarpa ECO T2 and was thinking of putting 22 Design AXL onboard.... will they be enough ? Should be for the money !

      Trying to decide on hammerhead v axl for...

      Trying to decide on hammerhead v axl for a new pair of 102mm under foot skis. I must admit, most of my skiing is lift-access. I do some yo-yo out of bounds (typically boot-pack hikes) with roughly 6 days of true touring-for-turns in a season. With daughter age 3, I don't see hut trips in my near future. I will use these bindings on wider skis leaving me a narrow ski & hammerhead for not-so-fluffy days. Worth getting the axl, or stick with the hammerhead?

      Best Answer

      Well, for years before the Axl debuted, pinheads looking for performance always toured on their HHs, usually moving their position to 1 or taking the adjusters out completely for easier touring. Combine that with a soft boot and touring isnt that bad.

      But with the Axl, you have the performance of the HH with a free pivot. Even if you dont use the tour function all the time, its not like you are going to give up performance.

      How do the 3 positions of the Axl compare...

      How do the 3 positions of the Axl compare to the 5 of the Hammerhead? I've only ever skied the Hammerhead and liked position 2 for powder / softer boots and position 3 for the firmer stuff. Is slot 2 on the HH analogous to 1 on the Axl? Or do they not compare at all?

      Overall, the Axl feels stiffer than the HH.

      Position 1 of the Axl is close to position 3 of the HH.

      Position 2 of the Axl is close to position 4 of the HH.

      Position 3 of the Axl is close to position 5 of the HH.

      Unanswered Question

      i have skied these for 2 full seasons now...

      i have skied these for 2 full seasons now and i love them. i ski them with scarp a t race boots and k 2 side stash skis. they are the best downhill telemark bindings ever made. they are okay for hiking in and up but they are great for coming down.

      I currently have size 26 boots. But I could...

      I currently have size 26 boots. But I could go (and probably will with my next pair) a size smaller. Is there truly no overlap in boot sizes between small and large bindings? If I would like to use a size 25 boot and a size 26 boot on the same binding, which binding do you recommend (small or large)?

      Best Answer

      You run into a multi-faceted dilema, here. Different boot manufacturers have different boot sole lengths for the same size boot, so you have to consider that, as well as the binding size. It would be much easier if 22 Designs would list BSL instead of mondo size on its sizing guide. I couldn't find any info on 22 Designs' website.

      So, I called some experts. They said that you should be able to use the small for up to a size 26 mondo, especially if you're in a Scarpa boot (which generally run larger in mondo sizing for the same street shoe size some reason).



      Has anyone had any issues with these...

      Has anyone had any issues with these bindings chewing up the toe or releasing, as in your foot twists out during a turn a turn and you almost kill yourself release? I tried adjusting them quite a bit but could never get them just right to meet up with my Scarpa T2X's.

      I am having the same problem with the T1 and Axl binding. The front of the boots have been torn off. The 22 design guys weren't much help. Binding is set at the stiff setting. Problem is the plastic flex plate doesn't extent towards the front of the boot far enough. Combination of riding a stiff boot, with a stiff binding setting and riding low. Didn't see this problem with T2 boots.

      Does this binding come with climbing bars...

      Does this binding come with climbing bars for touring? In the picture it doesn't look like it.

      Wow, stepping into the Axls from G3s is a...

      Wow, stepping into the Axls from G3s is a world of difference in terms of control and power. The one issue I noticed after my first day out is a lot of heel rub in my boot, which is keeping me from doing as much of a knee bend as I'd like. Seems that, even in the lowest/front setting, I'm not getting enough toe flex and it's forcing my heel to come up in my boot to help make the forward plant. Any thoughts or recommendations on further adjustments I can make here? Maybe it's a boot issue, which are Ener-Gs, and they've just packed out too much?

      Also got similar heel rub issue when I started to ski with my AXLs in 3rd position with my old T1s. But after moving into 2nd position I don't have any problems. I guess it all depends on how well the boot keep your feet fixed while skiing/bending your knees. Can't help you with further binding adjustments though.

      I am having the same problem. I am using brand new T1's and Axl's mounted on Rossignol S3. I am 5'11 145lbs. I have tried all three positions but I definitely like the two tighter ones more. I get the heel rub on both of these positions though but I get more control ... any suggestions?

      Take your liners into to get remolded, and make sure the heel cup is in a good position on your foot. Yes, it does take more force to flex forward, but that is what you want. Stop trying to put your knee down so much, and stay tall. It will improve your form, and give you room to absorb impact.
      If you're a lightweight skier, then you'll want to use those forward pin positions, but if you're bigger, and stronger, then you probably just need to adjust your technique. Be more aggressive, and the Axl will deliver all the power you need, right back to you.

      Question for someone who has skied these...

      Question for someone who has skied these bindings -

      I love my Hammerheads for the resort, and today I got to try the Axls for free thanks to Mammoth Mountaineering's Telebration. I skied the Axls in the middle position and they seemed veeeerrrryyyy stiff. I'm 6'1'', 195 LBs and I usually ski the Hammerheads in the second stiffest position. I'm worried that the first position on the Axls will be too soft and the middle position will be too stiff. I was skiing G3 Tonics, which in my opinion were pretty squirrly, so it wasn't the ideal evaluation. Any thoughts about the 3 different settings on the Axls? I want to get these based on how much I love the hammerheads but I'm worried about the range of stiffness for the descent.

      Man up! Position 1 will be fine for you, but the Axl gives more power, and you are big enough to drive them. The Axl is the best tele binding on the market. Try skiing your HH's in Position 3, and get used to a more active flex. It will vastly improve your skiing, since you are a big guy. You've got an inch and forty-five pounds on me, and I ride stiff springs and position 3 (or HH 5). I'm not super strong or anything, but the active flex keeps my style tight and powerful, which is why I ride the HH and Axl. Just try it, and be more aggressive, and I'll bet you'll learn to love them!

      I have skied back country for approx. 30...

      I have skied back country for approx. 30 years. No longer ski aggressivly but do ski mostly California Cascades crude. I have retired from lift served on three pin except for those perfect powder days. Currently using Scarpa T2 boots( broken buckles and can't find replacements). Karhu Catamount Skies with Voile release bindings and Chile cables (broken lots of cables and can't find replacements). All equip. is 10+ years old. I am considering replacing with Garmont Excursion boots. Madshus Eon or Epoch skis ( easy touring skis that can turn) I am considering Voile Switchbacks, G3 Targa Ascent, or Design 22 Axl bindings? Would rather error on too much binding that will not break and last for 10 yrs.! Any suggestions on my selection of boots, skis, and bindings will be appreciated. Thanks! Solo from Redding,Ca.

      If you want something that will last forever, the axle is it. It's also very adjustable in how active it is by simply moving a pin. It weighs a bit more than the others, but you probably won't be able to wear this out or break it if you tried. That said, I think the voile switchbacks would be better than the Targa's if you decide to go that route, but no other binding has so much adjustability or durability.

      See my reply, below, to Tom S. Get Garmont excursions, install Intuition alpine liners and add a Garmont power strap (I pop riveted mine to the top of the boot shell in rear). This creates a tele boot with all the power we old folks need, and mine are lighter than any of my NNN BC boots. I use mine on everything from narrow touring skis (Fischer E99) to BD Kilowatts, and I like them better than my T1s. This brings me to my problem with the Axl: even the most forward pivot point is not light enough for me (132 lbs). I think you will like the performance of the Voile Switchback or the Targa T3 Ascents better than that of the Axl (I do). But get the Voile (see my review of the Targa Ascent, posted elsewhere on this web site today). Before you were skiing back country, I was doing this with wood skis and carried an extra plastic ski tip. Now when I ski with Targas, I have to carry an entire extra binding.

      Unanswered Question

      Can you have two climbing bars on the heel...

      Can you have two climbing bars on the heel piece at the same time & can you have both bars up at the same time when using the taller bar? (standard size & tall size)

      I am looking for a great binding that will...

      I am looking for a great binding that will fit a pair of old school Aslo Extremes...Looking for advice

      How stiff are your boots? they aren't on my list of hefty 4 buckle beasts. The axle is a pretty hefty binding, it wouldn't be paired very well with a soft boot. You would probably be better off going with a binding better matched for your boots. Voile switchbacks or G3 targas/ascents might not be a bad way to go, plus they are significantly cheaper. As long as they have the 75mm duckbill they should fit in just about any binding except Rottefella's NTN